Genome MedicineGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
An optimized variant prioritization process for rare disease diagnostics: recommendations for Exomiser and Genomiser
Isabelle B. CoopersteiniD, Shruti MarwahaiD, Alistair N. Ward, Shilpa N. KobreniD, Jennefer N. CarteriD, Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Aaron R. QuinlaniD, Abdul Aziz ElkadriiD, Adeline L. VanderveriD, Adriana P. RebeloiD, Alan H. BeggsiD, Albert R. La SpadaiD, Alden HuangiD, Alex PauliD, Alexander Miller, Alistair N. Ward, Allen E. Bale, Allyn McConkie‐RoselliD, Alyson Krokosky, Alyssa A. Tran, Andrea Lynne GropmaniD, Andres Vargas, Andrew B. CrouseiD, Andrew B. StergachisiD, Anna HurstiD, , Emily GlantoniD
Abstract
PurposeWhole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) are increasingly used as standard genetic tests to identify the diagnostic variants in rare disease cases. However, prioritizing these variants to reduce the time and burden of manual interpretation by clinical teams remains a significant challenge. The Exomiser/Genomiser software suite is the most widely adopted open-source software for prioritizing coding and non-coding variants. Despite its ubiquitous use, limited data-driven guidelines currently exist to optimize its performance for diagnostic variant prioritization. Based on detailed analyses of Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) probands, this study presents optimized parameters and practical recommendations for deploying the Exomiser and Genomiser tools. We also highlight scenarios where diagnostic variants may be missed and propose alternative workflows to improve diagnostic success in such complex cases. MethodsWe analyzed 386 diagnosed probands from the UDN, including cases with coding and non-coding diagnostic variants. We systematically evaluated how tool performance was affected by key parameters, including gene:phenotype association data, variant pathogenicity predictors, phenotype term quality and quantity, and the inclusion and accuracy of family variant data. ResultsParameter optimization significantly improved Exomisers performance over default parameters. For WGS data, the percentage of coding diagnostic variants ranked within the top ten candidates increased from 49.7% to 85.5%, and for WES, from 67.3% to 88.2%. For non-coding variants prioritized with Genomiser, the top ten rankings improved from 15.0% to 40.0%. We also explored refinement strategies for Exomiser outputs, including using p-value thresholds and flagging genes that are frequently ranked in the top 30 candidates but rarely associated with diagnoses. ConclusionThis study provides an evidence-based framework for variant prioritization in WES and WGS data using Exomiser and Genomiser. These recommendations have been implemented in the Mosaic platform to support the ongoing analysis of undiagnosed UDN participants and provide efficient, scalable reanalysis to improve diagnostic yield. Our work also highlights the importance of tracking solved cases and diagnostic variants that can be used to benchmark bioinformatics tools.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 17
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Critical assessment of variant prioritization methods for rare disease diagnosis within the Rare Genomes Project
Sarah L. Stenton, Melanie O’Leary, … Anne O’Donnell‐Luria·Human GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2024
- Comparative analysis of WGS and WES for genetic diagnosis in a pediatric Albanian population.
Paskal Cullufi, Mirela Tabaku, … Avenida P. H. Rolfs·medRxiv·Jul 24, 2025
- A Bioinformatics Pipeline for Whole Exome Sequencing: Overview of the Processing and Steps from Raw Data to Downstream Analysis
Narendra Kumar Meena, Praveen Mathur, … Prashanth Suravajhala·BIO-PROTOCOLPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2018
- A variant prioritization tool leveraging multiple instance learning for rare Mendelian disease genomic testing
Ho Heon Kim, Ju Yeop Baek, … Kyoungyeul Lee·medRxiv·Apr 18, 2024
- Clinical Evaluation of an AI System for Streamlined Variant Interpretation in Genetic Testing
Jiri Ruzicka, Jean‐Marie Ravel, … Laurent Mesnard·Current Issues in Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2026
- Divine: Prioritizing Genes for Rare Mendelian Disease in Whole Exome Sequencing Data
Changjin Hong, Jean Rene V. Clemenceau, … TaeHyun Hwang·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2018