bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Comparative analyses of tailbeat frequency and stride length reveal how regionally endothermic fishes cruise fast
Soma TokunagaiD, Nicholas Leslie PayneiD, Ryo KawabeiD, Itsumi NakamuraiD, Seishiro Furukawa, Wei‐Chuan ChiangiD, Jayson M. SemmensiD, Carl G. MeyeriD, Yuuki Y. WatanabeiD
Abstract
Cruising speed is a key factor affecting prey-search efficiency and migration range in continuously swimming animals. Tunas and lamnid sharks (e.g., white sharks) have convergently evolved traits for high-speed cruising, including the ability to maintain slow-twitch, aerobic red muscle (RM) warmer than ambient water, known as RM endothermy. Despite their well-known high cruising speeds, kinematic features underlying their elevated speeds remain unclear. Swim speed is the product of tailbeat frequency (TBF; Hz) and stride length (SL, the absolute distance traveled per tailbeat; m). RM endothermy is expected to elevate TBF by enhancing muscle contraction performance. Furthermore, within RM-endothermic fishes, tunas and lamnid sharks may exhibit distinct kinematic features because of differences in caudal fin morphology and tailbeat amplitude. Here, we compiled kinematic parameters from 20 fish species, including five RM-endothermic species, measured in the wild using animal-borne sensors. Comparative analyses showed that, for a given body mass and water temperature, RM-endothermic fishes exhibited 1.9 times higher cruising speed and TBF than ectothermic fishes, while SL remained similar. Within RM-endothermic fishes, tunas exhibited 2.3 times higher TBF than similar-sized lamnid sharks, whereas lamnid sharks showed 1.7 times longer SL than similar-sized tunas. These results indicate that RM endothermy is generally associated with higher TBF, while significant kinematic differences remain between tunas and lamnid sharks. This divergence may be partly explained by the greater caudal fin area and tailbeat amplitude in lamnid sharks. It may also reflect contrasting skeletal types of teleosts and elasmobranchs, which potentially influence body stiffness and swimming kinematics.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Fish locomotor variation: connecting energetics and kinematic modulation
Yangfan Zhang, Divya Ramesh, … GEORGE V. LAUDER·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2025
- Functional Morphology of Endurance Swimming Performance and Gait Transition Strategies in Balistoid Fishes
A. B. George, M. W. Westneat·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2018
- 3D computational models explain muscle activation patterns and energetic functions of internal structures in fish swimming
- Salmonids exhibit an acute behavioral response to heterothermal environments
Robert Naudascher, Stefano Brizzolara, … Roman Stocker·eLifePeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2026
- From lab to ocean: bridging swimming energetics and wild movements to understand red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) behavior in a tidal estuary
Brendan J. Gibbs, James A. Strother, … James C. Liao·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2026
- Oxygen consumption of drift-feeding rainbow trout: the energetic tradeoff between locomotion and feeding in flow
J. L. Johansen, O. Akanyeti, J. C. Liao·bioRxiv·Dec 26, 2019