Ecology and EvolutionEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Combining artificial intelligence and local ecological knowledge to document the largest ever-counted Cape buffalo mega-herd
Emily BennittiD, Blair R. CostelloeiD, Benjamin KogeriD, Elodie WielgusiD, Gaseitsiwe Smollie MasungaiD, Alexandre CaroniD
Abstract
Large aggregations of wild mammals are declining globally, sometimes before they can be scientifically documented and their ecological value understood, although non-scientists may be aware of these phenomena. Video recording of wildlife by non-academics is becoming more frequent with increasing activities of humans in natural habitats. This opportunistically-collected material can document rare or ecologically-important events, such as large aggregations, and thus provide potentially valuable data for ecologists and conservationists. We used footage of a large herd of Cape buffalo recorded by a wildlife film producer in the Mababe Depression, northern Botswana, and applied automated detection and tracking techniques to count individuals as they moved across the video frame. To complement this demographic snapshot, we accessed local ecological knowledge from stakeholders to provide contextual information for a more complete understanding of the ecosystem processes potentially driving population movement and trends. Manual review of the automated count resulted in a minimum group size of 3676 buffalo and a total estimated herd size of 4131 (range 3828-4446), which matched herd size estimates provided by local stakeholders. To our knowledge, this is the largest documented group of Cape buffalo, which we identify as a mega-herd and recommend research into the costs, benefits and ecological consequences of forming such large groups. This study represents an opportunistic collaboration among wildlife filmmakers, computer scientists, lay experts and ecologists, and highlights the value of combining contributions from different fields to generate information that can be used in conservation practice.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Field percentile
- top 15%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sustainable cattle management by communities supports African wildlife
Erin Connolly, Holly A.I. Pringle, … Kate E. Jones·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2025
- Mapping potential for human encounters with dangerous large mammals across a community-led Wildlife Management Area in southern Tanzania based on overlapping signs of recent activity
Jude O'Regan, Lucia J. Tarimo, … Gerry F. Killeen·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2026
- Abundance, density, and social structure of African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) in a human-modified landscape in southwestern Gabon
Colin M. Brand, Mireille Johnson, … Nelson Ting·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2020
- Developing methods for measuring national distributions and densities of wild mammals using camera traps: A Kosovo study
S. E. Beatham, A. I. Ward, … V. Gjinovci·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2020
- Botswana’s wildlife losing ground as Kalahari Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) are dezoned for livestock expansion
D. Keeping, N. Kashe, … !Nate Brahman·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2019
- Population size, density, and ranging behaviour in a key leopard population in the Western Cape, South Africa
L. Müller, W. D. Briers-Louw, … R. Amin·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2021