Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Addressing Inaccurate Nosology in Mental Health: A Multi Label Data Cleansing Approach for Detecting Label Noise from Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data in Mood and Psychosis Disorders
Hooman RokhamiD, Godfrey D. PearlsoniD, Anees AbroliD, Haleh FalakshahiiD, Sergey PlisiD, Vince D. CalhouniD
Abstract
BackgroundMental health diagnostic approaches are seeking to identify biological markers to work alongside advanced machine learning approaches. It is difficult to identify a biological marker of disease when the traditional diagnostic labels themselves are not necessarily valid. MethodsWe worked with T1 structural magnetic resonance imaging data collected from individuals with mood and psychosis disorders from over 1400 individuals comprising healthy controls, psychosis patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives including 176 bipolar probands, 134 schizoaffective probands, 240 schizophrenia proband, 581 patients relatives and 362 controls. We assumed there might be noise in the diagnostic labeling process. We detected label noise by classifying the data multiple times using a support vector machine classifier, and then we flagged those individuals in which all classifiers unanimously mislabeled those subjects. Next, we assigned a new diagnostic label to these individuals, based on the biological data (MRI), using iterative data cleansing approach. ResultsSimulation results showed our method was highly accurate in identifying label noise. Both diagnostic and Biotype categories showed about 65% and 63% respectively of noisy labels with the largest amount of relabeling occurring between the healthy control and bipolar and schizophrenia disorder individuals as well as in the unaffected close relatives. The extraction of imaging features highlighted regional brain changes associated with each group. ConclusionsThis approach represents an initial step towards developing strategies that need not assume existing mental health diagnostic categories are always valid, but rather allows us to leverage this information while also acknowledging that there are misassignments.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 27
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating the diagnostic utility of applying a machine learning algorithm to diffusion tensor MRI measures in individuals with major depressive disorder
David M. Schnyer, Peter C. Clasen, … Christopher Graham Beevers·Psychiatry Research NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2017
- Machine Learning Predicts Treatment Response in Bipolar & Major Depressive Disorders
Mustafa S. Salman, Eric Verner, … Vince D. Calhoun·bioRxiv·May 13, 2022
- Inferring health conditions from fMRI-graph data
PierGianLuca Porta Mana, Claudia Bachmann, Abigail Morrison·bioRxiv·May 3, 2018
- Grey matter biomarker identification in Schizophrenia: detecting regional alterations and their underlying substrates
Vasiliki Chatzi, Rui Pedro A. G. Teixeira, … Jacques‐Donald Tournier·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2018
- Deep Feature Extraction for Resting-State Functional MRI by Self-Supervised Learning and Application to Schizophrenia Diagnosis
Yuki Hashimoto, Yousuke Ogata, … Yuichi Yamashita·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2021
- Opaque Ontology: Neuroimaging Classification of ICD-10 Diagnostic Groups in the UK Biobank
Ty O. Easley, Xiaoke Luo, … Janine Diane Bijsterbosch·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025