bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Species abundance plays a dominant role in local and regional extinctions in freshwater communities and allows the identification of selective extinctions
Ryan J. Almeida, Elizabeth G. Biro, Lauren M. Woods, Kevin G. SmithiD
Abstract
Recent declines in global biodiversity emphasize that understanding the factors that determine extinction risk should be a priority for ecologists and conservation biologists. A key question is whether extinctions are nonrandom and selective, in which case knowledge of selectivity may help predict and prevent future extinction. We suggest, however, that a premature focus on the identification of selective, trait-based determinants of extinctions risk is problematic if the potential importance of stochastic extinction processes are not first considered. Within this context we aimed to determine the roles that stochastic extinction and species abundance play in extinction risk by applying a rarefaction-based null model approach to analyzing biodiversity declines and extinctions in an experimental system. We focused on aquatic macroinvertebrate declines and extinction caused by predation by fish (Lepomis cyanellus) in semi-natural freshwater mesocosms. We found that null-predicted local extirpations based on the random loss of individuals were a significant predictor of observed local extirpations, and that the majority of observed extinctions were consistent with stochastic mechanisms of extinction, as predicted by a rarefaction model. We were able to identify a number of selective extinctions that were not predicted by the rarefaction model, and while these were relatively rare, they contributed to greater-than-expected loss of diversity at both local (mesocosm) and regional (whole experiment) spatial scales. Our results confirm that species abundance and occupancy are among the most important factors in identifying extinction risk in response to a disturbance. Moreover, owing to our use of a stochastic null model, we also conclude that measures of abundance are important indicators of extinction probability because they are operated on by the random loss of individuals, suggesting that stochastic extinction is an important process in this system and in biodiversity loss in general.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Climate-driven habitat loss and natural fragmentation increase extinction risk and compromise population viability in freshwater fish
Jessica Côte, Gaël Grenouillet, … Bernard Hugueny·Global Change BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Do persistent rare species experience stronger negative frequency dependence than common species?
Glenda Yenni, Peter Adler, Morgan Ernest·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2016
- Should regional species loss be faster, or slower, than local loss? It depends on density-dependent rate of death
Petr Keil, Adam Thomas Clark, … François Leroy·Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2025
- Extinction rate has a complex and non-linear relationship with area
Petr Keil, Juliano S. Cabral, … Marten Winter·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2016
- Stochastic competitive exclusion leads to a cascade of species extinctions
Jose A Capitan, Sara Cuenda, David Alonso·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2016
- Species interactions drive continuous assembly of freshwater communities in stochastic environments
A. Tabi, T. Siqueira, J. D. Tonkin·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2023