Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Neck muscle spindle noise biases reaches in a multi-sensory integration task
Abstract
Reference frame Transformations (RFTs) are crucial components of sensorimotor transformations in the brain. Stochasticity in RFTs has been suggested to add noise to the transformed signal due to variability in transformation parameter estimates (e.g. angle) as well as the stochastic nature of computations in spiking networks of neurons. Here, we varied the RFT angle together with the associated variability and evaluated the behavioral impact in a reaching task that required variability-dependent visual-proprioceptive multi-sensory integration. Crucially, reaches were performed with the head either straight or rolled 30deg to either shoulder and we also applied neck loads of 0 or 1.8kg (left or right) in a 3x3 design, resulting in different combinations of estimated head roll angle magnitude and variance required in RFTs. A novel 3D stochastic model of multi-sensory integration across reference frames was fitted to the data and captured our main behavioral findings: (1) neck load biased head angle estimation across all head roll orientations resulting in systematic shifts in reach errors; (2) Increased neck muscle tone led to increased reach variability, due to signal-dependent noise; (3) both head roll and neck load created larger angular errors in reaches to visual targets away from the body compared to reaches toward the body. These results show that noise in muscle spindles and stochasticity in general have a tangible effect on RFTs underlying reach planning. Since RFTs are omnipresent in the brain, our results could have implication for processes as diverse as motor control, decision making, posture / balance control, and perception.\n\nNew & NoteworthyWe show that increasing neck muscle tone systematically biases reach movements. A novel 3D multisensory integration across reference frames model captures the data well and provides evidence that the brain must have online knowledge of full body geometry together with the associated variability to accurately plan reach movements.
- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Field percentile
- top 30%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effector-dependent response deterioration by stochastic transformations reveals mixed reference frames for decisions
T. Scott Murdison, Dominic Standage, … Gunnar Blohm·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2017
- Dissociable effects of urgency and evidence accumulation during reaching revealed by dynamic multisensory integration
Anne H. Hoffmann, Frédéric Crevecoeur·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2024
- Different sensory information is used for state estimation when stationary or moving
Aaron L. Wong, Alyssa N. Eyssalenne, … Amanda S. Therrien·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2024
- Is it me or the train moving? Humans resolve sensory conflicts with a nonlinear feedback mechanism in balance control
Lorenz Assländer, Matthias Albrecht, … Robert J. Peterka·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2025
- Postural effects on arm movement variability are idiosyncratic and feedback-dependent
Preyaporn Phataraphruk, Qasim Rahman, … Christopher A. Buneo·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2020
- Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations
Parisa Abedi Khoozani, Dimitris Voudouris, … Katja Fiehler·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2020