bioRxivEcology
Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear
M. T. Kohl, D. R. Stahler, M. C. Metz, J. D. Forester, M. J. Kauffman, N. Varley, P. J. White, D. W. Smith, D. R. MacNulty
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWA landscape of fear (LOF) is a map that describes continuous spatial variation in an animals perception of predation risk. The relief on this map reflects, for example, places that an animal avoids to minimize risk. Although the LOF concept is a potential unifying theme in ecology that is often invoked to explain the ecological and conservation significance of fear, quantified examples of a LOF over large spatial scales are lacking as is knowledge about the daily dynamics of a LOF. Despite theory and data to the contrary, investigators often assume, implicitly or explicitly, that a LOF is a static consequence of a predators mere presence. We tested the prediction that a LOF in a large-scale, free-living system is a highly-dynamic map with peaks and valleys that alternate across the diel (24-hour) cycle in response to daily lulls in predator activity. We did so with extensive data from the case study of Yellowstone elk (Cervus elaphus) and wolves (Canis lupus) that was the original basis for the LOF concept. We quantified the elk LOF, defined here as spatial allocation of time away from risky places and times, across nearly 1000-km2 of northern Yellowstone National Park and found that it fluctuated with the crepuscular activity pattern of wolves, enabling elk to use risky places during wolf downtimes. This may help explain evidence that wolf predation risk has no effect on elk stress levels, body condition, pregnancy, or herbivory. The ability of free-living animals to adaptively allocate habitat use across periods of high and low predator activity within the diel cycle is an underappreciated aspect of animal behavior that helps explain why strong antipredator responses may trigger weak ecological effects, and why a LOF may have less conceptual and practical importance than direct killing.
- organism: mouse
- organism: human
- organism: rat
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: trajectory inference
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Testing the ecological and behavioural responses of mammals to the Landscape of Fear.
Stefano Tolusso, Giovanni Zanfei, Alessio Mortelliti·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2025
- Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
J. Cusack, M. T. Kohl, … D. R. MacNulty·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2018
- Not so scary after all? Decoding the landscape of fear through hormonal responses to risky times and places
Levi Newediuk, Brett R. Jesmer, … Eric Vander Wal·bioRxiv·May 9, 2025
- The predator activity landscape predicts the anti-predator behavior and distribution of prey in a tundra community
J. Clermont, A. Grenier-Potvin, … D. Berteaux·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2020
- Red deer individual landscapes of fear in response to human recreation.
Björn Böhme, Anne Peters, … Anne Gabriela Hertel·Behavioral EcologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- Hunger drives switching and searching response in a social predator
C. Prokopenko, S. Zabihi-Seissan, … E. Vander Wal·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2023