Peer Community JournalEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Population size estimation when multiple samples carrying the risk of misidentification are taken within the same capture occasion from the same individual
Abstract
Although non-invasive sampling is increasingly used in capture-recapture (CR) monitoring, it carries a risk of misidentification that, if ignored, causes an overestimation of population size. Models that deal with misidentification have been proposed. However, these models assume that only one sample can be collected per individual at one occasion. This is not true for several monitoring programs based on DNA, for example for those that extract the DNA from faecal samples. The models do not take repeated observations into account, leading to biased estimates. In this paper, we develop an approach that extends the latent multinomial model (LMM) of Link et al., 2010 using a Poisson distribution to model the number of samplings of the same individual on a given occasion. We then conduct simulations to test how our new model performs. As an illustration, we applied the new Poisson model to a collection of Eurasian otter faeces (Lampa et al., 2015). Our model yields unbiased estimates of population size when the expected number of samples per individual ({lambda}) is sufficiently high: simulations with{lambda} [≥] 0.36 and five capture occasions or with{lambda} [≥] 0.23 and seven or more occasions. In contrast, when{lambda} = 0.11 (corresponding to about 42%, 53% and 62% of the individuals being detected with respectively 5, 7 and 9 occasions), the population size is consistently underestimated. Applying the model to the otter dataset confirms the presence of misidentifications, consistent with the authors expectations. Our findings indicate that repeated observations can be modelled without bias. The application on otters shows that our model is necessary to accurately estimate population size in presence of misidentification and repeated observations.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 25th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Using informative priors to account for identifiability issues in occupancy models with identification errors
Célian Monchy, Marie‐Pierre Étienne, Olivier Giménez·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2025
- Mark loss can strongly bias demographic rates in multi-state models: a case study with simulated and empirical datasets
F. Touzalin, E. J. Petit, … S. J. Puechmaille·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2022
- Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models
C. Milleret, P. Dupont, … R. Bischof·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2019
- ANALYSING PATTERNS IN POPULATION DYNAMICS USING REPEATED POPULATION SURVEYS WITH THREE TYPES OF DETECTION DATA
Guillaume Péron, Mathieu Garel·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2018
- Estimating abundance of a recovering transboundary brown bear population with capture-recapture models
C. Vanpe, B. Piedallu, … O. Gimenez·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2021
- Double-observer approach with camera traps: Towards an unbiased density estimation of unmarked animal populations
Y. Nakashima, S. Hongo, … Z. C. B. Dzefck·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2021