S4-Oligo: optimizing polygenic score methods for clinical deployment

Abstract

Polygenic scores (PGSs) have progressed toward clinical utility in recent years, demonstrating odds ratios that are comparable with both lifestyle-related and monogenic risk factors for several complex diseases. However, PGS implementation relies on developing analytically and clinically valid assays. Methods for developing polygenic models (PGMs) that incorporate tens of thousands to millions of variants require either genome-wide chip genotyping combined with imputation or whole genome sequencing, limiting their portability. Additionally, variants may be in regions where the local genomic sequence makes it difficult to assay, and multi-allelic or strand ambiguous variants can make bioinformatics more complicated. Because of these challenges, attempts to develop a reliable assay for published PGMs can produce multiple variations from the same underlying model, hindering routine clinical deployment and incorporation into multi-factorial risk prediction models. In this analysis, we present an adjustment to the previously published select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) PGM method designed to optimize performance for realistic clinical use by restricting to a pre-specified number of available SNPs that are well-captured by genotyping arrays. We compare the performance of this oligogenic S4 method (S4-Oligo) to currently published PGSs as well as the full S4 model for prediction of breast, colorectal, ovarian, and prostate cancers in the All of Us Research Program, Biobank Japan, and UK Biobank. We find that S4-Oligo matches or exceeds the accuracy of published PGMs at comparable model sizes while retaining between 88% and 99% of the performance of the original S4 model when limited to 1,000 variants.