Journal of VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A deep convolutional neural network trained for lightness constancy is susceptible to lightness illusions
Jaykishan Y. PateliD, Alban FlachotiD, Javier Vázquez-CorraliD, David H. BrainardiD, Thomas S. A. WallisiD, Marcus A. BrubakeriD, R. F. Murray
Abstract
Human viewers are able to perform tasks that depend on accurate estimates of surface reflectance, even across large changes in illumination and context. This is a remarkable ability, and successful image-computable models of how the visual system achieves this have remained elusive. Recently, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been developed that are adept at estimating surface reflectance. Here we evaluated one such network as a starting point for a new model of human lightness perception by testing whether it was susceptible to a range of classic lightness illusions. We implemented a CNN and trained it via supervised learning to estimate surface reflectance at each pixel in grayscale, rendered images of geometric objects. We examined the networks output on several illusions, including the argyle, Koffka, snake, simultaneous contrast, Whites, and checkerboard illusions, as well as control figures. We included variants where low-luminance regions important to the illusions were generated either by low reflectance or by cast shadows. For comparison, we carried out a lightness matching experiment with human observers using the same stimuli, and also examined the outputs of three classic lightness and brightness models. The CNN largely removed lighting effects such as shading and shadows, and produced good reflectance estimates on a test set. It also qualitatively predicted the illusions perceived by humans in most cases, the exceptions being Whites and checkerboard illusions. The CNN outperformed classical models, both at estimating reflectance and at tracking human lightness matches. These findings support a normative view of lightness perception and highlight the promise of deep learning models in this area.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deep neural networks trained for estimating albedo and illumination achieve lightness constancy differently than human observers.
Alban Flachot, Jaykishan Y. Patel, … Richard F. Murray·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2026
- Exploring Perceptual Illusions in Deep Neural Networks
Emily J Ward·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2019
- A Unified Account of Lightness Illusions via Edge-BasedReconstruction of Natural Images
Srijani Saha, Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2026
- Human gloss perception reproduced by tiny neural networks
Takuma Morimoto, Arash Akbarinia, … Roland W. Fleming·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2026
- Modelling surface color discrimination under different lighting environments using image chromatic statistics and convolutional neural networks
Samuel Ponting, Takuma Morimoto, Hannah E. Smithson·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2022
- Human-like monocular depth biases in deep neural networks
Yuki Kubota, Taiki Fukiage·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2025