FEBS LettersScientific Communication & EducationPeer-reviewed journal article
Leaving Science: Attrition of Biologists in 38 OECD Countries
Abstract
This study examines biologists leaving science in 38 OECD countries in the past two decades. We use publication metadata from a global bibliometric database (raw Scopus data at the micro-level of individual scientists). In a cohort-based and longitudinal fashion, we follow individual men and women scientists over time, from their first to their last publication (N=86,178). We examine four academic disciplines: AGRI (agricultural and biological sciences), BIO (biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology), IMMU (immunology and microbiology), and NEURO (neuroscience). We apply survival analysis, conceptualizing scientific life as a sequence of scholarly publishing events. Our Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows how women disappear from science: in BIO, about 60% are still in science after 5 years, 40% after 10 years, and only 20% by the end of the period examined (i.e., after 19 years). The percentages are substantially higher for men: approximately 70%, 50%, and 30%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimations indicate that women in the largest discipline (BIO) are 23.26% more likely to leave science after 10 years and 39.74% more likely to leave science at the end of the study period. Gender difference in attrition, slightly visible after 5 years, increase consistently in later career stages. The probability of surviving for women after 15 years varies considerably, from 47.8% in AGRI to 27.6% in IMMU; for men, the probability is about a fifth higher. Our data show that with the passage of time, women disappear from science in ever-larger proportions compared to men. Gender differences in attrition in the four disciplines have been and continue to be high, but comparing the 2000 and 2010 cohorts, have slightly decreased over time.
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The publication and citation gender gap in Biology: bibliometric analysis of Biology faculty at top United States universities
David Alvarez‐Ponce, James Vesper·ScientometricsPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2026
- Sociality enhances survival in science, especially for female researchers
J. E. M. van der Wal, R. Thorogood, N. P. C. Horrocks·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2020
- An updated and expanded characterization of the biological sciences academic job market
Brooklynn Flynn, Ariangela J. Kozik, … Nafisa M. Jadavji·Frontiers in Research Metrics and AnalyticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 25, 2024
- Gender imbalances of retraction prevalence among highly cited authors and among all authors
Stefania Boccia, Antonio Cristiano, … John P. A. Ioannidis·Research Integrity and Peer ReviewPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2026
- Gender stereotype and the scientific career of women: Evidence from biomedical research centers
J. G. Montalvo, D. Alimonti, … I. Vernos·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2020
- Differential correction of gender imbalance for top-cited scientists across scientific subfields over time
J. Ioannidis, K. Boyack, … J. Baas·bioRxiv·May 25, 2023