PLoS ONEPlant BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Balancing the supply and demand for taxonomy: an analysis of European taxonomic capacity and policy needs.
Quentin GroomiD, Melanie De NolfiD, Lina M. Estupiñán-SuáreziD, Sofie MeeusiD
Abstract
Taxonomy is a cornerstone of biological science and essential to biodiversity policy, yet it faces persistent structural challenges collectively known as the "taxonomic impediment". These include limited capacity, uneven geographic and taxonomic coverage, and a disconnect between the supply of expertise and its societal demand. In this study, we present a meta-research analysis of taxonomic activity in Europe over the past decade, drawing on publication metadata from OpenAlex, Wikidata, and GBIF. Using an open and reproducible workflow, we identify more than 31,000 authors affiliated with European institutions who have contributed to taxonomic publications, and we assess their taxonomic and institutional distribution. We explore how this supply of expertise compares with the kinds of demands that arise from European biodiversity policy, including legally binding instruments such as the Birds and Habitats Directives and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, as well as strategic initiatives focused on invasive alien species, crop wild relatives, and species of conservation concern. Our results highlight clear imbalances in capacity across taxonomic groups and regions, with some politically and ecologically significant taxa receiving comparatively little attention. This work illustrates how openly available data can be used to evaluate taxonomic capacity and its alignment with policy needs, and it provides a framework for others to adopt in support of more strategic planning and investment in taxonomy.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- "Dark taxonomy": a new protocol for overcoming the taxonomic impediments for dark taxa and broadening the taxon base for biodiversity assessment
R. Meier, A. Srivathsan, … D. d. S. Amorim·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2023
- A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.'s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science
R. Meier, B. Blaimer, … D. Yeo·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2021
- How well is Italian biodiversity represented in red lists and conservation legislation? Taxonomic biases, coverage gaps and the assessment-to-legislation bottleneck
Emanuele Miccolis, Maria Berica Rasotto, … Telmo Pievani·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2026
- Toward transparent taxonomy: an interactive web-tool for evaluating competing taxonomic arrangements
O. V. Vernygora, F. A. H. Sperling, J. R. Dupuis·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2023
- Taxonbridge: an R package to create custom taxonomies based on the NCBI and GBIF taxonomies
Werner Pieter Veldsman, Giulia Campli, … Marc Robinson‐Rechavi·bioRxiv·May 2, 2022
- Closing Gaps But Increasing Bias In North American Butterfly Inventory Completeness
V. Shirey, M. W. Beltiz, … R. Guralnick·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2020