bioRxivEcologyPreprint
A case for multi-gear assessments: Detection probabilities of nearshore fish with eDNA and seine nets vary by functional traits
Lia K. DomkeiD, Kimberly J. LedgeriD, Jessica M. Whitney, Shannon M. KacheliD, Wesley A. LarsoniD, Ginny L. EckertiD, Diana S. BaetscheriD
Abstract
Ecological studies aim to understand species distributions, yet the methods used to sample affect which species are detected (i.e., gear selectivity) and may be influenced by species traits. Interactions between traditional gear selectivity for marine fishes and their species traits have been studied, but such studies have generally not extended to selectivity of environmental DNA (eDNA). Here, we investigated which functional species traits (scale type, schooling behaviour, and position-in-water-column) are selected for by eDNA metabarcoding and beach seines in nearshore eelgrass, mixed eelgrass, and understory kelp habitats. Using data from 35 sites across southeast Alaska, we applied occupancy modeling to estimate detection of species traits by each gear type. Detection probability with eDNA was 27 times greater for species with deciduous scales compared to species with non-deciduous scales, and lower for species with plates (rather than scales). Conversely, species with plates showed greater odds of detection with beach seines. Given the novelty of eDNA sampling, quantifying interactions between functional traits and gear selectivity will be important to accurately characterize species distributions across marine habitats.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effects of species traits and ecosystem characteristics on species detection by eDNA metabarcoding in lake fish communities
H. Doi, S. Matsuoka, … M. Miya·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2020
- Leveraging eDNA metabarcoding to characterize nearshore fish communities in Southeast Alaska: Do habitat and tide matter?
Wesley A. Larson, Patrick Barry, … Diana S. Baetscher·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2022
- eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine-scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
Rebecca R. Gehri, Wesley A. Larson, … Yue Shi·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2021
- Performance of eDNA capture methods for monitoring fish biodiversity in a hyper-tidal estuary
Jake M. Jackman, Naiara Guimarães Sales, … Allan D. McDevitt·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2024
- Marine water environmental DNA metabarcoding provides a comprehensive fish diversity assessment and reveals spatial patterns in a large oceanic area
N. Fraija-Fernandez, M.-C. Bouquieaux, … N. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2019
- Scoping the Line Up: A Comparison of Biomonitoring Methodologies for Surf Zone Fish Communities
Z. Gold, M. Q. Koch, … P. H. Barber·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2021