bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Enhancing Intra-Continental Biogeographical Ancestry Prediction Through a Machine Learning Marker Selection Method
Theresa Maurer, Lennart PuruckeriD, Frank HutteriD, Peter PfaffelhuberiD, Carola Sophia HeinzeliD
Abstract
While classifiers such as TabPFN (Hollmann et al., 2025) and SNIPPER (Phillips et al., 2007a) achieve strong intercontinental performance (Heinzel et al., 2025), their accuracy in classifying individuals within Europe remains low. One major factor contributing to this limitation is the set of genetic markers used for classification. Marker panels such as the VISAGE Enhanced Tool (Xavier et al., 2022) are commonly employed in forensic genetics because they contain ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) that distinguish very well between major continental populations. However, these panels are often not optimized for fine-scale differentiation within continents, where genetic variation is more subtle and population structure is rather continuous. We apply machine learning to select informative markers for intra-European classification, using data from Consortium et al. (2015). Compared with the VISAGE Enhanced Tool and allele frequency-based approaches (Phillips et al., 2007b; Kosoy et al., 2009; Nassir et al., 2009; Kidd et al., 2014; Phillips et al., 2014a), our marker sets achieve substantially higher accuracy within Europe: For four European populations, accuracy improves from 68.2% (VISAGE, 104 markers) to 73.7% (100 new markers) and 82.3% (200 new markers). For five populations, accuracy rises from 56.1% (VISAGE) to 64.5% (100 new markers). Our results show that tailored marker selection markedly improves intra-continental classification. While optimized here for Europe, the method can be applied to any region with sufficient training data.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Advancing Biogeographical Ancestry Predictions Through Machine Learning
Carola Sophia Heinzel, Lennart Purucker, … Peter Pfaffelhuber·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2025
- AIM-SNPtag: a computationally efficient approach for developing ancestry-informative SNP panels
Shilei Zhao, Cheng‐Min Shi, … Hua Chen·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2018
- In which cases does it make sense to classify an individual into one population and what are the alternatives?
Julika Schmitz, Jana Naue, … Carola Sophia Heinzel·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- How to choose sets of ancestry informative markers: A supervised feature selection approach
Peter Pfaffelhuber, Franziska Grundner-Culemann, … Franz Baumdicker·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2020
- Exploring ancestry inference of the Middle East
Noah Herrick, Mirna Ghemrawi, … Susan Walsh·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2024
- Screening and selection of 21 novel microhaplotype markers for ancestry inference in ten Chinese Subpopulations
Xing Zou, Guanglin He, … Zheng Wang·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2022