bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Predicting stop codon reassignment improves functional annotation of bacteriophages
Ryan CookiD, Andrea TelatiniD, George Spyro BourasiD, Antônio Pedro CamargoiD, Martin F. LarraldeiD, Robert Alan EdwardsiD, Evelien M. AdriaenssensiD
Abstract
The majority of bacteriophage diversity remains uncharacterised, and new intriguing mechanisms of their biology are being continually described. Members of some phage lineages, such as the Crassvirales, repurpose stop codons to encode an amino acid by using alternate genetic codes. Here, we investigated the prevalence of stop codon reassignment in phage genomes and subsequent impacts on functional annotation. We predicted 76 genomes within INPHARED and 712 vOTUs from the Unified Human Gut Virome catalogue (UHGV) that repurpose a stop codon to encode an amino acid. We re-annotated these sequences with modified versions of Pharokka and Prokka, called Pharokka-gv and Prokkagv, to automatically predict stop codon reassignment prior to annotation. Both tools significantly improved the quality of annotations, with Pharokka-gv performing best. For sequences predicted to repurpose TAG to glutamine (translation table 15), Pharokka-gv increased the median gene length (median of per genome medians) from 287 to 481 bp for UHGV sequences (67.8% increase) and from 318 to 550 bp for INPHARED sequences (72.9% increase). The re-annotation increased mean coding density from 66.8% to 90.0%, and from 69.0% to 89.8% for UHGV and INPHARED sequences. Furthermore, the proportion of genes that could be assigned functional annotation increased, including an increase in the number of major capsid proteins that could be identified. We propose that automatic prediction of stop codon reassignment before annotation is beneficial to downstream viral genomic and metagenomic analyses.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Annotation of Phage Genomes with Multiple Genetic Codes
Aaron Pfennig, Alexandre Lomsadze, Mark Yu. Borodovsky·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2022
- Stop codon recoding is widespread in diverse phage lineages and has the potential to regulate translation of late stage and lytic genes
A. L. Borges, Y. C. Lou, … J. F. Banfield·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2021
- Validation that human microbiome phages use alternative genetic coding with TAG stop read as Q
Samantha L. Peters, Adair L. Borges, … Robert L. Hettich·bioRxiv·Jan 6, 2022
- PhaGAMeToo: A semi-automated workflow for merging structural and functional annotation of phage genomes and generation of a GenBank file
Ebrar Demircioğlu, Martin Bole, … René Kallies·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026
- Synteny-aware functional annotation of bacteriophage genomes with Phynteny
Susanna R. Grigson, George Spyro Bouras, … Robert Alan Edwards·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2025
- MultiPhATE2: Code for Functional Annotation and Comparison of Bacteriophage Genomes
Carol L. Ecale Zhou, Jeffrey A. Kimbrel, … Stephanie Malfatti·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2021