henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Auditory-cognitive determinants of speech-in-noise perception: structural equation modelling of a large sample

Ester BenzaquéniD, Hasan ÇolakiD, Xiaoxuan GuoiD, Meher LadiD, Steven Rushton, Timothy David GriffithsiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Problems understanding speech-in-noise (SIN) are commonly associated with peripheral hearing loss. But pure tone audiometry (PTA) alone fails to fully explain SIN ability. This is because SIN perception is based on complex interactions between peripheral hearing, central auditory processing (CAP) and other cognitive abilities. We assessed interaction between these factors and age using a multivariate approach that allows the modelling of directional effects on theoretical constructs: structural equation modelling. We created a model to explain SIN using latent constructs for sound segregation, auditory (working) memory, and SIN perception, as well as PTA, age and measures of non-verbal reasoning. In a sample of 207 participants aged 18-81 years old, age was the biggest determinant of SIN ability, followed by auditory memory. PTA did not contribute to SIN directly, although it modified sound segregation ability, which covaried with auditory memory. A second model, using a CAP latent structure formed by measures of sound segregation, auditory memory, and temporal processing, revealed CAP to be the largest determinant of SIN ahead of age. Furthermore, we demonstrated the impact of PTA and non-verbal reasoning on SIN are mediated by their influence on CAP. Our results highlight the importance of central auditory processing in speech-in-noise perception.

Citations
10
FWCI
5.66
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBormann '26DiNino '25Lad '20Rizzi '25MacLean '26Guo '25
77% semantic matchNeuroscience
Brett M. Bormann, Nina E. Wade, Kelsey Mankel+6 more·bioRxiv·May 29, 2026