Human MutationGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Cancer SIGVAR: A semi-automated interpretation tool for germline variants of hereditary cancer-related genes
Hong LiiD, Shuixia Liu, Shuangying WangiD, Quanlei Zeng, Yulan CheniD, Ting FangiD, Yi ZhangiD, Ying ZhouiD, Yu ZhangiD, Kaiyue Wang, Zhangwei Yan, Cuicui Qiang, Meng Qing XuiD, Xianghua Chai, Yuying YuaniD, Ming Xing HuangiD, Hongyun ZhangiD, Yun XiongiD
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology published guidelines in 2015 for the clinical interpretation of Mendelian disorder sequence variants based on 28 criteria. ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Working Groups have developed many adaptations or refinements of these guidelines to improve the consistency of interpretation. We combined the most recent adaptations to expand the criteria from 28 to 48 and developed a tool called Cancer SIGVAR to help healthcare workers and genetic counselors interpret the clinical significance of cancer germline variants, which is critical for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of hereditary cancer. Our tool can accept VCF files as input and realize fully automated interpretation based on 21 criteria and semi-automated interpretation based on 48 criteria. We validated our tool on the ClinVar and CLINVITAE benchmark databases for the accuracy of fully automated interpretation, achieving an average consistency for pathogenic and benign assessment up to 93.40% and 82.54%, respectively. We compared Cancer SIGVAR with a similar tool, InterVar, and analyzed the main differences in criteria and implementation. In addition, to verify the performance of semi-automated interpretation based on 48 criteria, we selected 911 variants from two benchmark databases and reached an average classification consistency of 98.35%. Our findings highlight the need to optimize automated interpretation tools based on constantly updated guidelines.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Field percentile
- top 23%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Towards automation of germline variant curation in clinical cancer genetics
Vignesh Ravichandran, Zarina Shameer, … Joseph Vijai·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2019
- CancerVar: an Artificial Intelligence empowered platform for clinical interpretation of somatic mutations in cancer
- CanVar-UK: an online data platform supporting collaborative diagnostic interpretation of germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes
Charlie F Rowlands, Subin Choi, … CanVIG-UK·medRxiv·Mar 25, 2026
- Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK): updates on an exemplar national subspecialty multidisciplinary network
Alice Garrett, Sophie Allen, … CanVIG-UK·Journal of Medical GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2026
- Leveraging cancer mutation data to predict the pathogenicity of germline missense variants
Bushra Haque, David Cheerie, … Gregory Costain·medRxiv·Mar 11, 2024
- The CIViC knowledge model and standard operating procedures for curation and clinical interpretation of variants in cancer
Arpad M. Danos, Kilannin Krysiak, … Obi L. Griffith·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2019