BioData MiningBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Using GPT-4 to write a scientific review article: a pilot evaluation study
Zhiping Paul WangiD, Priyanka BhandaryiD, Yizhou WangiD, Jason H. MooreiD
Abstract
GPT-4, as the most advanced version of OpenAIs large language models, has attracted widespread attention, rapidly becoming an indispensable AI tool across various areas. This includes its exploration by scientists for diverse applications. Our study focused on assessing GPT-4s capabilities in generating text, tables, and diagrams for biomedical review papers. We also assessed the consistency in text generation by GPT-4, along with potential plagiarism issues when employing this model for the composition of scientific review papers. Based on the results, we suggest the development of enhanced functionalities in ChatGPT, aiming to meet the needs of the scientific community more effectively. This includes enhancements in uploaded document processing for reference materials, a deeper grasp of intricate biomedical concepts, more precise and efficient information distillation for table generation, and a further refined model specifically tailored for scientific diagram creation.
- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ChatGPT applications in Academic Research: A Review of Benefits, Concerns, and Recommendations
A. AlZaabi, A. ALamri, … A. AalAbdulsallam·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2023
- Artificial Intelligence's Contribution to Biomedical Literature Search: Revolutionizing or Complicating?
Rui Yip, Young Joo Sun, … Vinit B. Mahajan·PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2025
- Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers
C. A. Gao, F. M. Howard, … A. T. Pearson·npj Digital MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2023
- A Comprehensive Benchmark Study on Biomedical Text Generation and Mining with ChatGPT
Qijie Chen, Haotong Sun, … Hongming Chen·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2023
- ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review
J. P. H. Verharen·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2023
- Have AI-Generated Texts from LLM Infiltrated the Realm of Scientific Writing? A Large-Scale Analysis of Preprint Platforms
H. Cheng, B. Sheng, … Y.-F. Zheng·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2024