henhaobio
Sign in

BioData MiningBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Using GPT-4 to write a scientific review article: a pilot evaluation study

Zhiping Paul WangiD, Priyanka BhandaryiD, Yizhou WangiD, Jason H. MooreiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

GPT-4, as the most advanced version of OpenAIs large language models, has attracted widespread attention, rapidly becoming an indispensable AI tool across various areas. This includes its exploration by scientists for diverse applications. Our study focused on assessing GPT-4s capabilities in generating text, tables, and diagrams for biomedical review papers. We also assessed the consistency in text generation by GPT-4, along with potential plagiarism issues when employing this model for the composition of scientific review papers. Based on the results, we suggest the development of enhanced functionalities in ChatGPT, aiming to meet the needs of the scientific community more effectively. This includes enhancements in uploaded document processing for reference materials, a deeper grasp of intricate biomedical concepts, more precise and efficient information distillation for table generation, and a further refined model specifically tailored for scientific diagram creation.

Citations
18
FWCI
1.69
Field percentile
top 16%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.