bioRxivPaleontology
What do ossification sequences tell us about the origin of extant amphibians?
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe controversial origin of extant amphibians has been studied using several sources of data and methods, including phylogenetic analyses of morphological data, molecular dating, stratigraphic data, and integration of ossification sequence data, but a consensus has failed to emerge. We have compiled five datasets to assess the relative support for six competing hypotheses about the origin of extant amphibians: a monophyletic origin among temnospondyls, a monophyletic origin among lepospondyls, a diphyletic origin among both temnospondyls and lepospondyls, a diphyletic origin among temnospondyls alone, and two variants of a triphyletic origin, in which anurans and urodeles come from different temnospondyl taxa while caecilians come from lepospondyls and are either closer to anurans and urodeles or to amniotes. Our datasets comprise ossification sequences of up to 107 terminal taxa and up to eight cranial bones, and up to 65 terminal taxa and up to seven appendicular bones, respectively. Among extinct taxa, only two or three temnospondyl can be analyzed simultaneously for cranial data, but this is not an insuperable problem because each of the six tested hypotheses implies a different position of temnospondyls and caecilians relative to other sampled taxa. For appendicular data, more extinct taxa can be analyzed, including some lepospondyls and the finned tetrapodomorph Eusthenopteron, in addition to temnospondyls. The data are analyzed through maximum likelihood, and the AICc (corrected Akaike Information Criterion) weights of the six hypotheses allow us to assess their relative support. By an unexpectedly large margin, our analyses of the cranial data support a monophyletic origin among lepospondyls; a monophyletic origin among temnospondyls, the current near-consensus, is a distant second. All other hypotheses are exceedingly unlikely according to our data. Surprisingly, analysis of the appendicular data supports triphyly of extant amphibians within a clade that unites lepospondyls and temnospondyls, contrary to all molecular and recent paleontological phylogenies, but this conclusion is not very robust.View Full Text
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The disadvantage of derivation: conserved systematic flaws in primary data have repeatedly biased the phylogenetic inference of Temnospondyli (Tetrapoda, Amphibia)
B. M. Gee·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2022
- Phylogenomics supports a single origin of terrestriality in Isopods.
Jessica Thomas·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Exploring genome gene content and morphological analysis to test recalcitrant nodes in the animal phylogeny
K. Juravel, L. Porras, … G. Wörheide·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2021
- Palaeobiological inferences based on long bone epiphyseal and diaphyseal structure - the forelimb of xenarthrans (Mammalia)
Eli Amson, John A Nyakatura·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2018
- Limb proportions predict aquatic habits and soft-tissue flippers in extinct amniotes
Caleb M. Gordon, Lisa Sophia Freisem, … Bhart-Anjan Singh Bhullar·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2025
- A Phylogeny for Heterostraci (stem-gnathostomes)
E. Randle, J. N. Keating, R. S. Sansom·Papers in PalaeontologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 28, 2025