bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Promoting long-term forest landscape resilience in the Lake Tahoe basin
E. S. Abelson, K. M. Reynolds, A. M. White, J. W. Long, C. Maxwell, P. N. Manley
Abstract
Rapid environmental changes expected in the 21st century challenge the resilience of wildlands around the world. The western portion of the Lake Tahoe basin (LTW) in California is an important ecological and cultural hotspot that is at risk of degradation from current and future environmental pressures. Historical uses, fire suppression, and a changing climate have created forest landscape conditions at risk of drought stress, destructive fire, and loss of habitat diversity. We prospectively modeled forest landscape conditions for a period of 100 years to evaluate the efficacy of five unique management scenarios in achieving desired landscape conditions across the 23,600 hectares of LTW. Management scenarios ranged from no management other than fire suppression to applying treatments consistent with historical fire frequencies and extent (i.e., regular and broadscale biomass reduction). We developed a decision support tool to evaluate environmental and social outcomes within a single framework to provide a transparent set of costs and benefits; results illuminated underlying mechanisms of forest resilience and provided actionable guidance to decision makers. Sixteen attributes were assessed in the model after assigning weights to each, derived through a survey of stakeholder priorities, so that the contribution of each attribute to evaluations of scenario performance was influenced by the combined priorities of stakeholders. We found that removing forest biomass across the landscape, particularly when accomplished using extensive fire-based removal techniques, led to highly favorable conditions for environmental quality and promoting overall landscape resilience. Environmental conditions resulting from extensive fire-based biomass removal also had nominal variation over time, in contrast with strategies that had less extensive and/or used physical removal techniques, namely thinning. Our analysis provided a transparent approach to data assessment, considering the priorities of stakeholders, to provide insights into the complexities of maintaining optimal conditions and managing landscapes to promote ecosystem resilience in a changing world.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Strategic decision support for long-term conservation management planning.
E. S. Abelson, K. M. Reynolds, … S. Paplanus·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2021
- Multidecadal decline and recovery of aspen experiencing contrasting fire regimes: long-unburned, infrequent and frequent mixed-severity wildfire
C. Brewen, J.-P. Berrill, … C. L. Burnett·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2020
- LiDAR and hyperspectral-based structured population models show future forest fire frequency may compromise forest resilience
Jessica McLean, Tommaso Jucker, … Roberto Salguero‐Gómez·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2025
- Disequilibrium of fire-prone forests sets the stage for a rapid decline in conifer dominance during the 21st century
J. M. Serra-Diaz, C. Maxwell, … J. R. Thompson·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2018
- Wildfire drives a net decrease in forest live biomass across the Western United States
Claire M. Zarakas, Grayson Badgley, … James T. Randerson·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- A mismatch in wildfire impact reduction and ecological restoration in western U.S. fuel treatments
Timo Metz, J Nicholas Hendershot, Chuliang Song·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2026