bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Same place, different time: Leopards employ temporal partitioning as a co existence mechanism in a human-dominated, unprotected agricultural landscape in Sri Lanka
Abstract
As humans and wildlife increasingly overlap on a rapidly changing planet, it is important to understand co-existence mechanisms in unprotected landscapes, especially for large carnivores with which humans share an uneasy history. In Sri Lankas tea estate-dominated Central Highlands, a dense, widespread human population shares the landscape with the islands apex predator, the Sri Lankan leopard. This study used remote cameras to determine leopard density, generalized linear models to investigate leopard space-use in relation to key anthropogenic, ecological and environmental variables, and fitted kernel density curves to identify temporal activity patterns in this unprotected, human-dominated region. Adult leopard density (8.82/100 km{superscript 2}) was lower here than in key Sri Lankan National Parks, but not significantly so, suggesting good leopard habitat suitability. Spatially, leopards did not avoid humans but incorporated anthropogenic factors into space-use decisions, with areas of intermediate human and dog presence disproportionately used. Male leopards were more likely to occur at intermediate distances from human settlements, perhaps balancing risk with efficiency while navigating this human-dominated landscape. Female leopards biased space-use towards areas of high natural prey availability, aligning with their need to provide for cubs. Temporally, leopards were significantly less diurnal and more active at dusk than their protected counterparts, likely due to temporal partitioning from diurnally active humans, an adaptation which allows for human-leopard co-existence. This is the first comprehensive study of leopards outside protected areas in Sri Lanka, and highlights the value of unprotected landscapes and their importance for long-term leopard conservation. To foster human-leopard co-existence it is necessary to maintain current human activity patterns which allow for temporal partitioning; ensure existing natural prey resources remain to prevent leopards switching to domestic prey species; and reduce/eliminate the use of wire snares which transcend the effect of temporal partitioning by de-coupling persecution risk from human presence.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bed and breakfast in the bush: Selection of resting sites and kill sites by leopards (Panthera pardus) on Namibian farmland
Nik Sabeder, Teresa Oliveira, … Miha Krofel·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2026
- Population size, density, and ranging behaviour in a key leopard population in the Western Cape, South Africa
L. Müller, W. D. Briers-Louw, … R. Amin·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2021
- Determining Spatial Patterns of Human-Tiger and Human-Leopard Conflict across South Asia through A Multi-Scale Regional Approach
Anish Banerjee·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2026
- Carnivores in a metropolitan forest island: first spatial capture-recapture estimates reveal high densities of leopards and striped hyenas in Jaipur, India
Riddhi Sondagar, Kamakshi S. Tanwar, … Qamar Qureshi·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2026
- Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population
R. W. Havmoller, S. Tenan, … F. Rovero·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2018
- Spatial variation in population-density of snow leopards in a multiple use landscape in Spiti Valley, Trans-Himalaya
R. K. Sharma, K. Sharma, … C. Mishra·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2020