Abstract
Carraro and Altermatt1 performed an extensive analysis to study scaling properties of river networks. They concluded that: (1) branching "probability" is better termed as branching "ratio" for real river networks because it is not a probability; (2) branching ratio is a scale-dependent quantity as the value changes across spatial resolutions at which river networks are extracted (expressed as the threshold catchment area AT that initiates channels or pixel size l); (3) Optimal Channel Networks most accurately predicted the metapopulation stability and capacity. However, the supporting ground for these conclusions is either seriously flawed or inconclusive due to the improper use of branching probability, scale invariance, dimensions, and units.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Community resilience in a river network: the roles of connectivity and drying regime
Amélie Truchy, Romain Sarremejane, … Thibault Datry·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2025
- Inferring scaling laws of branching networks from their geometry by global optimization
Etienne Jessen, Dominik Schillinger, Marc C. Steinbach·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2026
- Generation and application of river network analogues for use in ecology and evolution
L. Carraro, E. Bertuzzo, … F. Altermatt·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2020
- Meta-ecosystem dynamics drive the spatial distribution of functional groups in river networks
C. Jacquet, L. Carraro, F. Altermatt·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2021
- On the efficacy of restoration in stream networks: comments, critiques, and prospective recommendations
D. Murray-Stoker·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2021
- Branching Networks Can Have Opposing Influences on Genetic Variation in Riverine Metapopulations
Ming-Chih Chiu, Bin Li, … Kozo Watanabe·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2020