henhao
Sign in
MicrobiologyEnvironmental Microbiology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Sea-ice microbial community succession and the potential role of parasitoids in the maintenance of diversity during the spring bloom

Kyle B. DilliplaineiD, Laura M. WhitmoreiD, Ana M. Aguilar‐IslasiD, Channing BoltiD, Kenneth DumackiD, Meibing JiniD, Mette KaufmaniD, Marc OggieriD, Gwenn M. M. HennoniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Sea ice is a crucial, yet declining, habitat in high latitude ecosystems. Here we present a high-temporal resolution amplicon sequence data set collected during the spring ice-algal bloom near Utqia[g]vik, Alaska in 2021 to study sea-ice microbial dynamics. The ice-algal bloom peaked on May 8th, reaching 46.6 mg chlorophyll a m-2, and thereafter became limited by nitrate availability. A massive bloom of the oil-degrading bacterium, Oleispira (>80% relative abundance), coincided with the algal bloom raising questions about hydrocarbon exposure. The sea-ice algal bloom was dominated by diatoms, particularly Nitzschia spp., and transitioned into a flagellate dominated post-bloom community which aligned with melt-associated changes to the physicochemical environment. We explored the relationship between putative parasitoids, Chytridiomycetes, Thecofilosea (Cercozoa), Oomycetes, Syndiniales (Dinoflagellata), and Labyrinthulomycetes (Bigyra), and potential microalgal hosts. Chytrids peaked periodically suggesting synchronized infections and Cryothecomonas (Thecofilosea) was observed parasitizing Nitzschia spp. for the first time in Arctic sea ice. Co-occurrence analysis suggested that diatoms, especially Nitzschia, were the primary hosts of Pacific-Arctic parasitoids, and that top-down parasitoid control may dramatically alter community composition over short timescales, such as days. These results provide important insights into the drivers of spring bloom timing and maintenance of microalgal diversity in sea ice.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1
FWCI
0.30
Field percentile
top 46%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.