PLoS Computational BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma
Abstract
We provide a novel computational framework on how biological and artificial agents can learn to flexibly couple and decouple neural task modules for cognitive processing. In this way, they can address the stability-plasticity dilemma. For this purpose, we combine two prominent computational neuroscience principles, namely Binding by Synchrony and Reinforcement Learning. The model learns to synchronize task-relevant modules, while also learning to desynchronize currently task-irrelevant modules. As a result, old (but currently task-irrelevant) information is protected from overwriting (stability) while new information can be learned quickly in currently task-relevant modules (plasticity). We combine learning to synchronize with several classical learning algorithms (backpropagation, Boltzmann machines, Rescorla-Wagner). For each case, we demonstrate that our combined model has significant computational advantages over the original network in both stability and plasticity. Importantly, the resulting models processing dynamics are also consistent with empirical data and provide empirically testable hypotheses for future MEG/EEG studies.\n\nAuthor summaryArtificial and biological agents alike face a critical trade-off between being sufficiently adaptive to acquiring novel information (plasticity) and retaining older information (stability); this is known as the stability-plasticity dilemma. Previous work on this dilemma has focused either on computationally efficient solutions for artificial agents or on biologically plausible frameworks for biological agents. What is lacking is a solution that combines computational efficiency with biological plausibility. Therefore, the current work proposes a computational framework on the stability-plasticity dilemma that provides empirically testable hypotheses on both neural and behavioral levels. In this framework, neural task modules can be flexibly coupled and decoupled depending on the task at hand. Testing this framework will allow us to gain more insight in how biological agents deal with the stability-plasticity dilemma.
- Citations
- 43
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Computational simulation reveals the critical role of spike-timing-dependent plasticity in synchrony
Yunqi Huang, Milad Lankarany, Gabriele M. T. D’Eleuterio·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2026
- The Brain As An Efficient And Robust Adaptive Learner
Sophie Denève, Alireza Alemi, Ralph Bourdoukan·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2017
- Rapidly Reconfigurable Dynamic Computing in Neural Networks with Fixed Synaptic Connectivity
Kai Mason, Sonia Sennik, … Wilten Nicola·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2026
- The temporal paradox of Hebbian learning and homeostatic plasticity
Friedemann Zenke, Wulfram Gerstner, Surya Ganguli·Current Opinion in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2017
- Fast Adaptation to Rule Switching using Neuronal Surprise
Martin Barry, Wulfram Gerstner·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2024
- Embedding stochastic dynamics of the environment in spontaneous activity by prediction-based plasticity
Toshitake Asabuki, Claudia Clopath A·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2025