How partial phenotyping to reduce generation intervals can help to increase annual genetic gain in selected honeybee populations
Tristan KistleriD, Evert W. BrascampiD, Benjamin BassoiD, Florence PhocasiD, Piter BijmaiD
Abstract
Honeybee breeding is organized around annual cycles, following seasonal change. Generation intervals are thus commonly multiples of whole years. Most queens are generally raised during spring or early summer in temperate climates. A generation interval of 1 year limits phenotyping to early recordable traits, before the spring following queens births. Some traits, however, can only be recorded later, as is typically the case for total honey yield. Their recording on selection candidates thus increases the generation interval to at least 2 years, a common interval on the dam path. Using stochastic simulation, we investigated the impact of halving the dam generation interval and therefore recording only early traits on candidate dams. The generation interval on the sire path remained at 2 years with complete phenotyping. Breeding goals with varying weights on early and late traits were considered, as well as different genetic correlations between traits, from negative to positive. The acceleration of the breeding scheme generally resulted in an increased genetic gain for the two-trait breeding goals, from 0% up to +47% after 20 years of selection. Although inbreeding rates per generation were slightly lower in the accelerated breeding scheme, associate inbreeding levels were about 20-30% higher after 20 years of selection due to the 33% increased generation turnover. To avoid too high inbreeding, shortening the generation interval should thus be accompanied by strategies to limit inbreeding while still retaining most of the genetic gain, such as increasing the breeding nucleus size by relaxing selection intensity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 11th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beekeepers' preferences for honeybee breeding goals: a French case study
Tristan Kistler, Benjamin Basso, … Florence Phocas·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2026
- Uncertainty in the mating strategy causes bias and inaccuracy in estimates of genetic parameters in honeybees
Tristan Kistler, E.W. Brascamp, … Florence Phocas·Genetics Selection EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2024
- A Two-Part Strategy using Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crop Breeding Programs
Owen M. Powell, R. Chris Gaynor, … John M. Hickey·bioRxiv·May 24, 2020
- Modelling the impacts of imports and non-native subspecies hybridisation in honeybees
I. Carlos, Laura K. Strachan, … Jana Obšteter·HeredityPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2026
- The principles of expected and realised genetic relatedness among individual honeybees
Laura K. Strachan, Jernej Bubnič, … Jana Obšteter·bioRxiv·May 26, 2024
- SIMplyBee: R package for simulating honeybee populations and breeding programs
Jana Obšteter, Laura K. Strachan, … Gregor Gorjanc·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2022