bioRxivEcologyPreprint
A global analysis of climate-driven reversal risks in forests
Chao WuiD, Michael L. GouldeniD, James T. RandersoniD, Anna T. TrugmaniD, Jonathan A. WangiD, Linqing Yang, Nezha AciliD, Susan C. Cook‐PattoniD, Danny CullenwardiD, Steven J. DavisiD, Christopher Alan WilliamsiD, William R. L. AndereggiD
Abstract
The integrity of forest-based climate solutions and carbon credits requires persistent carbon storage, but climate change is increasing the risk of natural disturbances that release carbon back into the atmosphere. Using global satellite data, disturbance modeling, and machine learning, we provide the first spatially explicit and scenario-based maps of long-term probability of carbon loss in global forests under different disturbance severities and climate scenarios. We find that North American conifer forests, tropical rainforests, and Asian (sub)tropical dry forests face the greatest risks, and that Eurasian temperate forests, African (sub)tropical dry forests face the lowest. Globally, the likelihood of reversals over 100 years is 31%-42% across all scenarios. Our work helps to maximize the benefits of forest-based climate solutions by informing more strategic project placement and more robust reversal-risk compensation mechanisms, such as buffer pools, and highlights critical additional science to better understand and manage risks of these essential climate solutions. Plain Language SummaryForests can help slow and lessen climate impacts. However, in places this benefit is becoming less reliable as climate change increases natural disturbances such as wildfires, drought, storms, and insect outbreaks, which can release stored carbon back into the atmosphere. In this study, we created the first scenario-based global maps of risks and found that the risk of carbon loss is widespread and highly variable across regions, with especially high vulnerability in North American conifer forests, tropical rainforests, and Asian tropical and subtropical dry forests. Our study highlights the importance of considering disturbance risks when siting forest projects for climate mitigation, and developing protocols for carbon markets, such as in voluntary programs and under the UNFCCC Paris Agreement. Key PointsO_LIA demographic model framework estimates the reversal risk from natural disturbances over 100 years in global forests C_LIO_LISpatially explicit maps under different severity scenarios show variation in the integrated 100-year risk of carbon reversal C_LIO_LISpatially explicit maps estimate the required buffer pool needed to compensate for disturbance-driven reversals in global forests C_LI
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Climate risks to carbon sequestration in US forests
W. R. L. Anderegg, O. S. Chegwidden, … J. J. Hamman·bioRxiv·May 11, 2021
- Trends in forest carbon offset markets in United States
L. Kaarakka, J. Rothey, L. E. Dee·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2022
- Current forest carbon offset buffer pools do not adequately insure against disturbance-driven carbon losses
William R. L. Anderegg, Anna T. Trugman, … Linqing Yang·Global Change BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2025
- Hurricanes Pose Substantial Risk to New England Forest Carbon Stocks
S. J. Tumber-Davila, T. Lucey, … J. Thompson·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2023
- Large and persistent social risks to forest carbon projects
Jacob I. Levine, Libby Blanchard, … William R. L. Anderegg·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2026
- Remote sensing reveals multi-decadal losses of tree cover in California driven by increasing fire disturbance and climate stress
J. A. Wang, J. T. Randerson, … J. B. Battles·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2021