PLoS ONEMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Taxonomic identification accuracy from BOLD and GenBank databases using over a thousand insect barcodes from Colombia
Nathalie Baena-BejaranoiD, Catalina ReinaiD, Diego Esteban Martínez ReveloiD, Claudia A. Medina, Eduardo TovariD, Sandra UribeiD, Jhon César Neita‐MorenoiD, Mailyn Adriana GonzaleziD
Abstract
Recent declines of insect populations at high rates have resulted in the need to develop a quick method to determine their diversity and to process massive data for the identification of species of highly diverse groups. A short sequence of DNA from COI is widely used for insect identification by comparing it against sequences of known species. Repositories of sequences are available online with tools that facilitate matching of the sequences of interest to a known individual. However, the performance of these tools can differ. Here we aim to assess the accuracy in identification of insect taxonomic categories from two repositories, BOLD Systems, and GenBank. This was done by comparing the sequence matches between taxonomist identification and the suggested identification from the platforms. We used 1160 sequences in eight orders of insects from Colombia. After the comparison, we reanalyzed the results from a representative subset of the data from the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera). Overall, BOLD systems outperformed GenBank, and the performance of both engines differed by orders and other taxonomic categories (species, genus and family). Higher rates of accurate identification were obtained at family and genus level. The accuracy was higher in BOLD for the orders Coleoptera at family, for Coleoptera and Lepidoptera at genus, and species level. The other orders performed similarly in both repositories. Moreover, the Scarabaeinae subset showed that in this group species were correctly identified when BOLD match percentage was above 93.4% and a total of 85% of the samples were correctly assigned to a taxonomic category. These results accentuate the great potential of the identification engines to place insects accurately into their respective taxonomic categories based on DNA barcodes and highlight the reliable use of BOLD Systems for insect identification in the absence of a large reference database for a highly diverse country.
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 35
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DNA barcodes and reliable molecular identifications in a diverse group of invasive pests: lessons from Bactrocera fruit flies on variation across the COI gene, introgression, and standardization
C. Doorenweerd, M. San Jose, … D. Rubinoff·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2020
- Megabarcoding dark taxa - Assessing the utility of mass DNA barcoding for phorid fly species discovery
Jiri Vihavainen, Niina Kiljunen, … Jaakko Pohjoismäki·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2025
- Insect Wing Classification of Mosquitoes and Bees Using CO1 Image Recognition.
Nayna Vyas-Patel, Sai Ravela, … John D Mumford·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2015
- A DNA barcode library for Culex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of South America with the description of two cryptic species of subgenus Melanoconion
Stanislas Talaga, Amandine Guidez, … Jean‐Bernard Duchemin·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2024
- Forensics and DNA Barcodes - Do Identification Errors Arise in the Lab or in the Sequence Libraries?
Mikko Pentinsaari, Sujeevan Ratnasingham, … Paul D. N. Hebert·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2020
- COInr and mkCOInr: Building and customizing a non-redundant barcoding reference database from BOLD and NCBI using a lightweight pipeline.
Emese Meglécz·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2023