henhaobio
Sign in

HeredityGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Quantitative genetic architecture of adaptive phenology traits in the deciduous tree, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray).

Thomas J. RichardsiD, Almir KaračićiD, Rami‐Petteri ApuliiD, Martin WeihiD, Pär K. IngvarssoniD, Ann-Christin Rönnberg WästljungiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

In a warming climate, the ability to accurately predict and track shifting environmental conditions will be fundamental for plant survival. Environmental cues define the transitions between growth and dormancy as plants synchronise development with favourable environmental conditions, however these cues are predicted to change under future climate projections which may have profound impacts on tree survival and growth. Here, we use a quantitative genetic approach to estimate the genetic basis of spring and autumn phenology in Populus trichocarpa to determine this species capacity for climate adaptation. We measured bud burst, leaf coloration, and leaf senescence traits across two years (2017-2018) and combine these observations with measures of lifetime growth to determine how genetic correlations between phenology and growth may facilitate or constrain adaptation. Timing of transitions differed between years, although we found strong cross year genetic correlations in all traits, suggesting that genotypes respond in consistent ways to seasonal cues. Spring and autumn phenology were correlated with lifetime growth, where genotypes that burst leaves early and shed them late had the highest lifetime growth. We also identified substantial heritable variation in the timing of all phenological transitions (h2 = 0.5-0.8) and in lifetime growth (h2 = 0.8). The combination of abundant additive variation and favourable genetic correlations in phenology traits suggests that cultivated varieties of P. trichocarpa have the capability to create populations which may adapt their phenology to climatic changes without negative impacts on growth.

Citations
24
FWCI
3.07
Field percentile
top 9%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.