bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
A Simulation-Based Evaluation of Total-Evidence Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process
Arong Luo, David A. Duchêne, Chi Zhang, Chao-Dong Zhu, Simon Y.W. Ho
Abstract
Bayesian molecular dating is widely used to study evolutionary timescales. This procedure usually involves phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequence data, with fossil-based calibrations applied as age constraints on internal nodes of the tree. An alternative approach is Bayesian total-evidence dating, which involves the joint analysis of molecular data from present-day taxa and morphological data from both extant and fossil taxa. Part of its appeal stems from the fossilized birth-death process, which provides a model of lineage diversification for the prior on the tree topology and node times. However, total-evidence dating faces a number of considerable challenges, especially those associated with fossil sampling and evolutionary models for morphological characters. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of total-evidence dating with the fossilized birth-death model. We simulated fossil occurrences and the evolution of nucleotide sequences and morphological characters under a wide range of conditions. Our analyses show that fossil occurrences have a greater influence than the degree of among-lineage rate variation or the number of morphological characters on estimates of node times and the tree topology. Total-evidence dating generally performs well in recovering the relationships among extant taxa, but has difficulties in correctly placing fossil taxa in the tree and identifying the number of sampled ancestors. The method yields accurate estimates of the origin time of the fossilized birth-death process and the ages of the root and crown group, although the precision of these estimates varies with the probability of fossil occurrence. The exclusion of morphological characters results in a slight overestimation of node times, whereas the exclusion of nucleotide sequences has a negative impact on inference of the tree topology. Overall, our results provide a detailed view of the performance of total-evidence dating, which will inform further development of the method and its application to key questions in evolutionary biology.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mismatch of the morphology model is mostly unproblematic in total-evidence dating: insights from an extensive simulation study
S. Klopfstein, R. Ryser, … T. Spasejovic·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2019
- Impacts of Taxon-Sampling Schemes on Bayesian Molecular Dating under the Unresolved Fossilized Birth-Death Process
- Estimating the age of poorly dated fossil specimens and deposits using a total-evidence approach and the fossilized birth-death process
J. Barido-Sottani, D. Zyla, T. A. Heath·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2021
- Fossils improve phylogenetic analyses of morphological characters
N. Mongiardino Koch, R. J. Garwood, L. A. Parry·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2020
- Estimating Divergence Times and Diversification Rates with the Unresolved Fossilized Birth-Death Process
Wang-Jin Lim, Levi Yoder Raskin, … Rasmus Nielsen·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2026
- Ignoring fossil age uncertainty leads to inaccurate topology and divergence times in time calibrated tree inference
J. Barido-Sottani, N. van Tiel, … R. C. Warnock·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2020