henhaobio
Sign in

American Journal of BotanyMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Peripatric speciation associated with genome expansion and female-biased sex ratios in the moss genus Ceratodon

Marta Nieto‐LugildeiD, Olaf WerneriD, Stuart F. McDanieliD, Petr KouteckýiD, Jan KučeraiD, Samah Mohamed RizkiD, Rosa María RosiD

PDFDOIPreprint
Citations
17
FWCI
1.26
Field percentile
top 20%

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDYA period of allopatry is widely believed to be essential for the evolution of reproductive isolation. However, strict allopatry may be difficult to achieve in some cosmopolitan, spore-dispersed groups, like mosses. Here we examine the genetic and genome size diversity in Mediterranean populations of the moss Ceratodon purpureus s.l. to evaluate the role of allopatry and ploidy change in population divergence.\n\nMETHODSWe sampled populations of the genus Ceratodon from mountainous areas and lowlands of the Mediterranean region, and from western and central Europe. We performed phylogenetic and coalescent analyses on sequences from five nuclear introns and a chloroplast locus to reconstruct their evolutionary history. We also estimated the genome size using flow cytometry, employing propidium iodide, and determined their sex using a sex-linked PCR marker.\n\nKEY RESULTSTwo well differentiated clades were resolved, discriminating two homogeneous groups: the widespread C. purpureus and a local group mostly restricted to the mountains in southern Spain. The latter also possessed a genome size 25% larger than the widespread C. purpureus, and the samples of this group consist entirely of females. We also found hybrids, and some of them had a genome size equivalent to the sum of the C. purpureus and Spanish genome, suggesting that they arose by allopolyploidy.\n\nCONCLUSIONSThese data suggest that a new species of Ceratodon arose via peripatric speciation, potentially involving a genome size change and a strong female-biased sex ratio. The new species has hybridized in the past with C. purpureus.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.