Author

C. R. Sugimoto

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Scientific Communication & Education· 3

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Approach:statistical model· 2 Research Focus:benchmarking· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

V. Lariviere· 3 shared A. M. Collings· 1 shared C. Ni· 1 shared D. Murray· 1 shared G. Badia· 1 shared G. F. Nane· 1 shared I. Basson· 1 shared J. Raymond· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2019-2023 · peak 1/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 19 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

3 shared papersScientific Communication & Education

V. Lariviere

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

3 papers

Recent·Most cited

Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals

C. Ni, I. Basson, G. Badia, N. Tufenkji, C. R. Sugimoto, V. Lariviere

This study finds women submit fewer papers to top journals than men and are more likely to cite lack of novelty or advice against submission as reasons, while men cite better fit in specialized journals.

bioRxiv · Aug 21, 2023Scientific Communication & Education

Task specialization across research careers

N. Robinson-Garcia, R. Costas, C. R. Sugimoto, V. Lariviere, G. F. Nane

The paper analyzes scientific career trajectories using Bayesian networks and archetypal analysis to identify three archetypes and gender biases across career stages.

bioRxiv · Jul 1, 2020Scientific Communication & Education

Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review

D. Murray, K. Siler, V. Lariviere, W. M. Chan, A. M. Collings, J. Raymond, C. R. Sugimoto

This paper analyzes peer review outcomes at eLife and finds higher acceptance rates for male authors and authors from North America/Europe, suggesting demographic homophily influences review decisions.

bioRxiv · Aug 4, 2019 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education