Author

I. R. Costa

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Plant Biology· 1 Scientific Communication & Education· 1

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Approach:statistical model· 2 Research Focus:benchmarking· 1 Assay:DNA methylation· 1 Research Focus:phylogenetics / evolution· 1 Organism:plant (other)· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

A. C. Tuler· 1 shared A. Giaretta de Oliveira· 1 shared A. R. Lourenco· 1 shared A. Stadnik· 1 shared B. Amorim· 1 shared C. A. M. Carvalho· 1 shared C. B. Haas· 1 shared C. E.B.Proenca· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2020-2023 · peak 1/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 24 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

1 shared paperPlant Biology

A. C. Tuler

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

2 papers

Recent·Most cited

Towards a species-level phylogeny for Neotropical Myrtaceae: notes on topology and resources for future studies

The Neotropical Myrtaceae Working Group, V. Staggemeier, B. Amorim, M. Bunger, I. R. Costa, J. E. Quintino de Faria, J. Flickinger, A. Giaretta de Oliveira, M. T. Kubo, D. Fernandes Lima, L. Lima dos Santos, A. R. Lourenco, E. Lucas, F. Mazine, J. Murillo-A, , T. Vasconcelos

This study constructs a taxonomically verified molecular supermatrix for Neotropical Myrteae, inferring a time-calibrated phylogenetic tree and identifying sampling gaps.

bioRxiv · Oct 18, 2023Plant Biology

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

C. F. D. Carneiro, V. G. S. Queiroz, T. C. Moulin, C. A. M. Carvalho, C. B. Haas, D. Rayee, D. E. Henshall, E. A. De-Souza, F. E. Amorim, F. Z. Boos, G. D. Guercio, I. R. Costa, K. L. Hajdu, L. van Egmond, M. Modrak, , O. B. Amaral

This study compares reporting quality between preprints and peer-reviewed articles, finding peer-reviewed articles have slightly better reporting quality but preprints are still valid scientific contributions.

bioRxiv · Oct 8, 2020Scientific Communication & Education