Author

M. Strinzel

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Scientific Communication & Education· 3

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Research Focus:benchmarking· 3 Approach:statistical model· 3

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Severin· 2 shared A. Cortegiani· 1 shared A. Giarratano· 1 shared A. Manca· 1 shared C. Gregoretti· 1 shared D. Moher· 1 shared G. Campisi· 1 shared G. Ingoglia· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2020-2022 · peak 2/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 36 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

2 shared papersScientific Communication & Education

A. Severin

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

3 papers

Recent·Most cited

SciCV, the Swiss National Science Foundation's new CV format

M. Strinzel, W. Kaltenbrunner, I. van der Weijden, M. von Arx, M. Hill

The paper evaluates the SciCV CV format introduced by the SNSF, finding it generally well-received but with mixed reactions to specific elements like metrics and publication lists.

bioRxiv · Mar 16, 2022 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education

Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project

A. Cortegiani, M. Ippolito, G. Ingoglia, A. Manca, L. Cugusi, A. Severin, M. Strinzel, V. Panzarella, G. Campisi, M. Lalu, C. Gregoretti, S. Einav, D. Moher, A. Giarratano

This study analyzes citation metrics of journals removed from Scopus for publication concerns, finding increased citations post-removal and prevalence of predatory practices.

F1000Research · May 21, 2020Peer-reviewedScientific Communication & Education

Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics

A. Severin, M. Strinzel, M. Egger, M. Domingo, T. F. Barros

This study examines reviewer characteristics for predatory and legitimate journals, finding that scholars reviewing for predatory journals are younger, less published, and more common in developing regions.

bioRxiv · Mar 9, 2020 · PreprintScientific Communication & Education