bioRxivPaleontology
Distinct causes underlie double-peaked trilobite morphological disparity
Abstract
Trilobite cephalic morphology impacted the autecology of individuals, and is critical for high- and low-level taxonomic assignments. Disparity in trilobite cephalon shape varied through time and was integral to the occupation of a diversity of ecological niches. To fully appreciate trilobite cephalic evolution, we must understand how this disparity varies, and what factors control cephalon morphometry. We explore the disparity of trilobite cephala through the Palaeozoic, and analyse the associations between cephalic morphometry and taxonomic assignment and geological Period, using a dataset of 983 2D trilobite cephalon outlines. Elliptical Fourier transformation visualised as a Principal Components Analysis suggests significant differences in morphospace occupation for order and Period groups, and comparisons of disparity measures also suggest significantly different disparities between the groups. Trilobite cephalic disparity peaks in the Ordovician and Devonian. The Cambrian-Ordovician expansion of morphospace occupation appears a result of radiation to new niches, and thus all trilobite orders were established by the late Ordovician. In comparison, the morphospace expansion from the Silurian to Devonian seems solely a result of within-niche diversification rather than novel niche occupation. However, analyses interrogating the regions of morphospace occupied, including centroid distances, average pairwise shape comparisons and Linear Discriminant Analysis demonstrate that, except for the order Harpida and the Cambrian and Ordovician Periods, order and geological Period could not be robustly predicted for an unknown trilobite. Further, Kmeans clustering analyses suggest the total dataset naturally subdivides into only seven groups that do not correspond with taxonomic orders, though Kmeans clusters do decrease in number through the Palaeozoic, aligning with findings of decreasing disparity.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Hierarchical importance of factors impacting trilobite cephalic disparity
Harriet B. Drage, Stephen Pates·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2025
- Anatomy of the mandibular corpus of extant cercopithecids : taxonomy and variation
Laurent Pallas, Masato Nakatsukasa, Yutaka Kunimatsu·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2024
- Anatomy of the mandibular symphysis of extant cercopithecids: taxonomy and variation
Laurent Pallas, Masato Nakatsukasa, Yutaka Kunimatsu·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2024
- A morphometric approach to the taxonomic dilemma of Zonozoe drabowiensis Barrande, 1872 and Zonoscutum solum Chlupá&ccaron, 1999 (Upper Ordovician, Czech Republic)
Lorenzo Lustri, Lukáš Laibl, … Stephen Pates·Swiss Journal of PalaeontologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2026
- A novel phylogenetic comparative model reveals strong signals for early high disparity in ichthyosaurs
Ricardo Ely, Fabio Machado·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- Contrasting Species-Level and Genus Level Disparity Patterns within the ammonoid family Acanthoceratidae
Luke Howard, Peter J. Wagner·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2026