Anatomy of the mandibular symphysis of extant cercopithecids: taxonomy and variation
Abstract
The symphyseal anatomy of extant and fossil cercopithecids has not yet been demonstrated as a useful tool for taxonomic discrimination, and the source of variation in cercopithecid symphysis has not been addressed on a broad taxonomic scale. Here, we used linear and angular dimensions to quantify symphysis shape. Using univariate, multivariate data and allometric regressions (partial least squares and phylogenetic generalized least square regressions), we addressed the hypothesis that extant cercopithecids can be distinguished by symphysis shape. Significant differences in univariate and multivariate data and allometric regressions permitted to distinguish cercopithecids at the subfamilial, tribal, and genus levels. We showed that multivariate data followed the distribution expected under Brownian Motion and significantly discriminates taxa at different taxonomic levels. Colobine symphysis are characterized by developed inferior transverse tori, short planum alveolare, and short symphysis, whereas cercopithecine symphysis are characterized by developed superior transverse tori, long planum alveolare, and long symphysis. Exceptions to this pattern exist within each subfamily, and this study underlines the particular anatomy of Colobus and Presbytis among the colobines, Allenopithecus among the Cercopithecini, and Theropithecus and Lophocebus among the Papionini. We also demonstrate that the relative development of the transverse tori, the relative length of the planum alveolare and symphyseal inclination are dimorphic traits. Specifically, we show that the symphysis of Procolobus verus, Nasalis larvatus, and Papio anubis is strongly dimorphic.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Anatomy of the mandibular corpus of extant cercopithecids : taxonomy and variation
Laurent Pallas, Masato Nakatsukasa, Yutaka Kunimatsu·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2024
- Distinct causes underlie double-peaked trilobite morphological disparity
Harriet B. Drage, Stephen Pates·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2024
- Skull allometries in three species of Didelphis (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae)
P. M. Pares-Casanova·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2022
- Hierarchical importance of factors impacting trilobite cephalic disparity
Harriet B. Drage, Stephen Pates·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2025
- The petrosal and basicranial morphology of Protoceras celer
S. V. Robson, J. M. Theodor, B. Seale·PLOS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2021
- Evolution of the skull in arvicoline cricetids (Rodentia) according to 3D morphometric insights: Part 1. Morphological disparity of the palato-spheno-pterygoid complex
Leonid L. Voyta, Daniel A. Melnikov·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2024