henhaobio
Sign in

PLoS Computational BiologySynthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Experimental Design in Biology

Neythen J. TreloariD, Nathan BraniffiD, Brian IngallsiD, Chris P. BarnesiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The field of optimal experimental design uses mathematical techniques to determine experiments that are maximally informative from a given experimental setup. Here we apply a technique from artificial intelligence--reinforcement learning--to the optimal experimental design task of maximizing confidence in estimates of model parameter values. We show that a reinforcement learning approach performs favourably in comparison with a one-step ahead optimisation algorithm and a model predictive controller for the inference of bacterial growth parameters in a simulated chemostat. Further, we demonstrate the ability of reinforcement learning to train over a distribution of parameters, indicating that this approach is robust to parametric uncertainty. 1 Author summaryBiological systems are often complex and typically exhibit non-linear behaviour, making accurate model parametrisation difficult. Optimal experimental design tools help address this problem by identifying experiments that are predicted to provide maximally accurate parameter estimates. In this work we use reinforcement learning, an artificial intelligence method, to determine such experiments. Our simulation studies show that this approach allows uncertainty in model parameterisation to be directly incorporated into the search for optimal experiments, opening a practical avenue for training an experimental controller without confident knowledge of the systems parameter values. We present this method as complementary to existing optimisation approaches and we anticipate that artificial intelligence has a fundamental role to play in the future of optimal experimental design.

Citations
37
FWCI
4.44
Field percentile
top 5%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBallard '19Jagadeesan '23Ranjan '26Xiong '25Desender '24Weaver '23
63% semantic matchNeuroscience
Ian C. Ballard, Samuel M. McClure·Journal of Neuroscience Methods·Jan 18, 2019· 57 citations