bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Deep Learning Improves Parameter Estimation in Reinforcement Learning Models
Hua-Dong XiongiD, Jian LiiD, Marcelo Gomes MattariD, Robert C. WilsoniD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWCognitive models are widely used in psychology and neuroscience to formulate and test hypotheses about cognitive processes. These processes are characterized by model parameters, which are then used for scientific inference. The reliability of scientific conclusions from cognitive modeling depends critically on the reliability of parameter estimation, yet estimating parameters remains a universal challenge particularly when data are too limited to constrain them. In such cases, multiple sets of parameters may explain the experimental data equally well within the same model, raising the question of which parameters are scientifically meaningful. We refer to this problem as parameter ambiguity. In this paper, we investigate parameter ambiguity in reinforcement learning under two optimization methods. We employ the de facto Nelder-Mead method (fminsearch) and a neural network trained to estimate parameters using a modern deep learning pipeline, which has seen limited application in cognitive modeling. Across ten decision-making datasets, we consistently find that the two methods produce substantially different parameter estimates despite achieving nearly identical fitting performance. To address this ambiguity, we introduce a systematic evaluation framework that goes beyond predictive accuracy to assess generalizability, robustness, identifiability, and test-retest reliability, thereby offering principled guidance on which parameter estimates should inform scientific inference. Applying this framework reveals that the neural network with a deep learning pipeline outperforms across these metrics. Our study establishes parameter ambiguity as an underappreciated challenge with significant implications for scientific replicability, highlighting that the choice of optimization method is a critical factor shaping scientific conclusions. We advocate for our multi-faceted evaluation approach to ensure reliable scientific inference and for broader integration of modern deep learning pipelines into cognitive modeling.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Interpretation of Computational Model Parameters Depends on the Context
Maria Katharina Eckstein, Sarah L. Master, … Anne Gabrielle Eva Collins·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2022
- Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models
M. Rmus, T.-F. Pan, … A. G. E. Collins·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2023
- Joint Modeling of Reaction Times and Choice Improves Parameter Identifiability in Reinforcement Learning Models
Ian C. Ballard, Samuel M. McClure·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2019
- Better than maximum likelihood estimation of model-based and model-free learning style
Sadjad Yazdani, Abdol‐Hossein Vahabie, … Majid Nili Ahmadabadi·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2018
- Parameter and model recovery of reinforcement learning models for restless bandit problems
Ludwig Danwitz, David Mathar, … Jan Peters·Computational Brain & BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2022
- Harnessing the flexibility of neural networks to predict dynamic theoretical parameters underlying human choice behavior
Yoav Ger, Eliya Nachmani, … Nitzan Shahar·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2024