PLOS ONEEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Defining dual-axis landscape gradients of human influence for studying ecological processes
Abstract
Ecological processes are strongly shaped by human landscape modification, and understanding the reciprocal relationship between ecosystems and modified landscapes is critical for informed conservation. Single axis measures of spatial heterogeneity proliferate in the contemporary gradient ecology literature, though they are unlikely to capture the complexity of ecological responses. Here, we develop a standardized approach for defining multi-dimensional gradients of human influence in heterogeneous landscapes and demonstrate this approach to analyze landscape characteristics of ten ecologically distinct US cities. Using occupancy data of a common human-adaptive songbird collected in each of the cities, we then use our dual-axis gradients to evaluate the utility of our approach. Spatial analysis of landscapes surrounding ten US cities revealed two important axes of variation that are intuitively consistent with the characteristics of multi-use landscapes, but are often confounded in single axis gradients. These were, a hard-to-soft gradient, representing transition from developed areas to non-structural soft areas; and brown-to-green, differentiating between two dominant types of soft landscapes: agriculture (brown) and natural areas (green). Analysis of songbird data demonstrated that occupancy responds to both hard-to-soft (decreasing with development intensity) and brown-to-green gradient (increasing with more natural area). Overall, our results reveal striking consistency in the dominant sources of variation across ten geographically distinct cities and suggests that our approach advances how we relate variation in ecological responses to human influence. Our case study demonstrates this: robins show a remarkably consistent response to a gradient differentiating agricultural and natural areas, but city-specific responses to the more traditional gradient of development intensity, which would be overlooked with a single gradient approach. Managing ecological communities in human dominated landscapes is extremely challenging due to a lack of standardized approaches and a general understanding of how socio-ecological systems function, and our approach offers promising solutions.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ecosystem service gradients at protected area borders reveal multiple patterns and prevalent management conflicts
Alberto González‐García, Margot Neyret, … Sandra Lavorel·Conservation BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2026
- Gradient analysis of landscape variation in Norway
T. Simensen, R. Halvorsen, L. Erikstad·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2020
- Distribution of Critical Areas for Ecological Conservation in Multiple Scenarios ---- Emphasizing the Impact of Human Activities
- Urbanization weakens the latitudinal diversity gradient in birds
Jory Griffith, Jennifer M. Sunday, Anna L. Hargreaves·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2025
- A functional trait approach reveals the effects of landscape context on ecosystem services provided by urban birds
T. M. Swartz, J. M. Gleditsch, J. E. Behm·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2022
- Designing urban green-space heterogeneity across urbanisation gradients to maintain avian richness
Jie Hu, Danique van Os, … Yali Si·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2026