Natural statistics of head roll: implications for Bayesian inference in spatial orientation
Sophie C.M.J. WillemseniD, Leonie Oostwoud WijdenesiD, Robert J. van BeersiD, Mathieu Koppen, W. Pieter MedendorpiD
Abstract
We previously proposed a Bayesian model of multisensory integration in spatial orientation (1). Using a Gaussian prior, centered on an upright head orientation, this model could explain various perceptual observations in roll-tilted participants, such as the subjective visual vertical, the subjective body tilt (1), the rod-and-frame effect (2), as well as their clinical (3) and age-related deficits (4). Because it is generally assumed that the prior reflects an accumulated history of previous head orientations, and recent work on natural head motion suggests non-Gaussian statistics, we examined how the model would perform with a non-Gaussian prior. In the present study, we first experimentally generalized the previous observations in showing that also the natural statistics of head orientation are characterized by long tails, best quantified as a t-location-scale distribution. Next, we compared the performance of the Bayesian model and various model variants using such a t-distributed prior to the original model with the Gaussian prior on their accounts of previously published data of the subjective visual vertical and subjective body tilt tasks. All of these variants performed substantially worse than the original model, suggesting a special value of the Gaussian prior. We provide computational and neurophysiological reasons for the implementation of such a prior, in terms of its associated precision-accuracy trade-off in vertical perception across the tilt range. New & NoteworthyIt has been argued that the brain uses Bayesian computations to process multiple sensory cues in vertical perception, including a prior centered on upright head orientation which is usually taken to be Gaussian. Here, we show that non-Gaussian prior distributions, although more akin to the statistics of head orientation during natural activities, provide a much worse explanation of such perceptual observations than a Gaussian prior.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Field percentile
- 49th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bayesian inference in arm posture perception
Valeria Carmen Peviani, Manon G. A. Joosten, … W. Pieter Medendorp·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2024
- Bayesian Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Causal Inference Strategies in Multisensory Heading Perception
Luigi Acerbi, Kalpana Dokka, … Wei Ji Ma·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2018
- Explaining attractive and repulsive biases in the subjective visual vertical
Stefan Glasauer, W. Pieter Medendorp·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026
- Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias that favors prior-congruent evidence
Marika Constant, Elisa Filevich, Pascal Mamassian·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 22, 2025
- Biases in hand perception are driven by somatosensory computations, not a distorted hand model
Valeria Carmen Peviani, Luke Edward Miller, W. Pieter Medendorp·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024
- Perceptual decisions exhibit hallmarks of dynamic Bayesian inference
Julie A. Charlton, Wiktor F. Młynarski, … Robbe L. T. Goris·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2023