BioprintingBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Enhancing Precision in Bioprinting Utilizing Fuzzy Systems
Ashkan SedighiD, Dayna DiPiero, Kristy M. Shine, Ryan E. TomlinsoniD
Abstract
Bioprinting facilitates the generation of complex, three-dimensional (3D), cell-based constructs for a variety of applications. Although multiple bioprinting technologies have been developed, extrusion-based systems have become the dominant technology due to the diversity of substrate materials (bioinks) that can be accommodated, either individually or in combination. However, each bioink has unique material properties and extrusion characteristics that limit bioprinting precision, particularly when generating constructs from different bioinks. Here, we aimed to achieve high precision (i.e. repeatability) across samples by generating bioink-specific printing parameters using a systematic approach. We hypothesized that a fuzzy system could be used as a "black box" method to tackle the inherent vagueness and imprecision in 3D bioprinting data and uncover the optimal printing parameters for a specific bioink that would result in high accuracy and precision. Our fuzzy model was used to approximate and quantify the precision and ease of printability for two common bioinks - type I collagen and Pluronic F127, with or without dilution in MEM culture media. The model consisted of three inputs (pressure, speed, and dilution percent of bioink) and a single output (layer width). Using this system, we introduce the Bioink Precision Index (BPI), a metric that can be used to quantify and compare the precision of any bioink. Here, we show that printing with parameters optimized using BPI increases the precision for collagen (+15%) and Pluronic F127 (+29%) as compared to the manufacturers recommended printing parameters.
- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Field percentile
- top 35%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Approximating Scaffold Printability Utilizing Computational Methods
A. Sedigh, P. Ghelich, … R. E. Tomlinson·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2022
- Comparison of Type-1 and Type-2 Fuzzy Systems forMineralization of Bioprinted Bone
Ashkan Sedigh, Mohammad-R. Akbarzadeh-T, Ryan E. Tomlinson·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2021
- Improved accuracy and precision of bioprinting through progressive cavity pump-controlled extrusion
P. Fisch, M. Holub, M. Zenobi-Wong·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2020
- Mechanical Mapping of Bioprinted Hydrogel Models by Brillouin Microscopy
H. Mahmodi, R. Utama, … I. Kabakova·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2021
- Development of a High-Performance Open-Source 3D Bioprinter
D. J. Shiwarksi, J. W. Tashman, A. W. Feinberg·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2022
- Conformal Bioprinting of Bi-phasic Jammed Bioinks, Independent of Gravity, Orientation, and Curvature
Sushant Singh, Lihua Wei, … Axel Günther·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025