Crowding distorts features, not objects: structured target confusions in a 4AFC conjunction task
Abstract
Visual crowding is the disruption of peripheral object identification by nearby flanking clutter. It remains unclear whether crowding disrupts the bound representation of an object or degrades the object's component features separately. We addressed this with a 4AFC conjunction-report task in which observers reported both the orientation and the brightness of every target. Target Gabors at 6 degrees eccentricity were presented alone or flanked at 1, 3, or 5 degrees separation by Gabors varying independently in colour and/or orientation similarity to the target. We analysed the data three ways: joint accuracy, accuracy on each feature alone, and the statistical coupling between the two report channels. Orientation reports were principally impaired by orientation-similar flankers within the smallest target-flanker separations, whereas luminance reports were impaired by target-colour-similar flankers across a broader spatial range. Observed joint accuracy was closely predicted by the product of the two marginal accuracies in every condition. A complementary chi-square analysis of the full 4x4 stimulus-response matrices agreed with this conclusion at the most-crowded conditions, while revealing structured response biases that the ratio test could not detect. These biases were present at baseline and were not amplified by crowding. The conjunction errors observed under crowding therefore arose from two largely independent feature-specific failures, rather than from disruption of a representation in which the two features are bound. These results indicate that object-level crowding errors in this paradigm are the downstream signature of two independent feature-level processes rather than the breakdown of an object-level mechanism.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Crowding and binding: Not all feature-dimensions behave in the same way
Amit Yashar, Xiuyun Wu, … Marisa Carrasco·Psychological SciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2019
- Visual crowding is a combination of an increase of positional uncertainty, source confusion, and featural averaging
William John Harrison, Peter John Bex·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2017
- Dissociable effects of visual crowding on the perception of colour and motion
John A. Greenwood, Michael J. Parsons·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2020
- A common cortical basis for variations in visual crowding
John A. Greenwood, Katarina Jerotic, … Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2023
- Mixture model investigation of the inner-outer asymmetry in visual crowding reveals a heavier weight towards the visual periphery
Adi Shechter, Amit Yashar·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2021
- Crowding changes appearance systematically in peripheral, amblyopic, and developing vision
Alexandra V. Kalpadakis-Smith, Vijay Tailor, … John A. Greenwood·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·May 4, 2022