Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Movement Effort does not alter the Planning Horizon of Sequential Reaching Movements
Aslan BellmanniD, Leonie Oostwoud WijdenesiD, W. Pieter MedendorpiD
Abstract
Everyday tasks often involve multiple reaching movements in a sequence, where the choices made for one movement also affect the conditions for subsequent movements. Previous research indicates that humans are capable of planning ahead to optimize such sequences. Here, we ask whether increasing the resistance to movement prompts participants to plan even further ahead to reduce overall movement effort. Participants (n=28) were shown 14 targets that varied in size, value and location, and were instructed to accumulate as many points as possible. To collect each target, they reached while holding the handle of a robotic manipandulum that applied a resistive force. We analyzed their target choices using a planning model that takes into account the size, value and distance of several future targets. We expected that, as resistance - and therefore the effort required to move between two targets - increased, participants would plan further ahead to minimize total movement distance. Results show that participants typically planned 2-4 targets ahead. However, increasing resistance did not significantly affect the planning horizon. We conclude that movement effort is not a primary constraint on the planning horizon in sequential reaching movements. NEW AND NOTEWORTHYHumans are capable of planning ahead in sequential reaching movements, but whether they adjust their planning horizon according to task demands is unknown. To manipulate task demands, we increased movement effort during a free target collection task. This makes planning more beneficial. However, we found no adjustment in planning horizon, suggesting that movement effort might not be a critical factor for planning in sequential reaching movements.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 1th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The planning horizon for movement sequences
Giacomo Ariani, Neda Kordjazi, … Jörn Diedrichsen·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2021
- Future movement plans interact in sequential arm movements
Mehrdad Kashefi, Sasha Reschechtko, … J. Andrew Pruszynski·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2024
- Adaptive planning in human search
Moritz J. F. Krusche, Eric Schulz, … Maarten Speekenbrink·bioRxiv·May 14, 2018
- Overlap of movement planning and movement execution reduces reaction time by up to 100ms.
Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Valéry Legrain, Philippe Lefèvre·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2016
- Toward naturalistic reaching: Intermediate reaches under uncertainty generalize to walking, but are not obligatory
Cady V. Seavey, Christian Seegelke, … Tobias Heed·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2026
- A control policy can be adapted to task demands during both motor execution and motor planning
Jean‐Jacques Orban de Xivry, Robert M. Hardwick·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2024