Implementing Precision Medicine for Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Insights from The DCM Consortium
Elizabeth JordaniD, Hanyu NiiD, Patricia K. ParkeriD, Daniel D. KinnamoniD, ANJALI TIKU OWENSiD, Brian D. LowesiD, Chetan ShenoyiD, Cindy M. MartiniD, Daniel Philip JudgeiD, Daniel P. Fishbein, Douglas A. StolleriD, Elina MinamiiD, Evan Paul KransdorfiD, Frank W. SmartiD, Garrie J. HaasiD, Gordon S. HugginsiD, Gregory Alan EwaldiD, Jamie Elizabeth DiamondiD, Jane E. WilcoxiD, Javier JiméneziD, Jessica WangiD, Jose Antonio TallajiD, Mark H. DrazneriD, Mark R. HofmeyeriD, Matthew Thomas WheeleriD, , Ray E. HershbergeriD
Abstract
BackgroundClinical genetic evaluation of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is implemented variably or not at all. Identifying needs and barriers to genetic evaluations will enable strategies to enhance precision medicine care. MethodsAn online survey was conducted in June 2024 among cardiologist investigators of the DCM Consortium from US advanced heart failure/transplant (HF/TX) programs to collect demographics, training, program characteristics, genetic evaluation practices for DCM, and implementation needs. An in-person discussion followed. ResultsTwenty-five cardiologists (28% female, 12% Hispanic, 68% White) participated in the survey and 15 in the discussion; genetics training backgrounds varied greatly. Clinical genetic testing for DCM was conducted by all programs with annual uptake ranging from 5%-70% (median 25%). Thirteen respondents (52%) did not use selection criteria for testing whereas others selected patients based on specific clinical and family history data. Eight (32%) ordered testing by themselves, and the remainder had testing managed mostly by a genetic counselor or others with genetic expertise (16/17; 94%). Six themes were distilled from open-ended responses regarding thoughts for the future and included access to genetics services, navigating uncertainty, knowledge needs, cost concerns, family-based care barriers, and institutional infrastructure limitations. Following an in-person discussion, four areas were identified for focused effort: improved reimbursement for genetic services, genetic counselor integration with HF/TX teams, improved provider education resources, and more research to find missing heritability and to resolve uncertain results. ConclusionsHF/TX programs have implementation challenges in the provision of DCM genetic evaluations; targeted plans to facilitate precision medicine for DCM are needed.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Utility of polygenic risk scores in diagnostic genetic testing for dilated cardiomyopathy
Utpala Nanda Chowdhury, Eleni Giannoulatou, … Sonia H Shah·medRxiv·Jan 22, 2026
- An Evidence-based Assessment of Genes in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Elizabeth Jordan, Laiken Peterson, … Ray E. Hershberger·CirculationPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2021
- Comparing Cardiac Genetic Testing Pathways: Impacts on Access, Informed Choice, and Decisional Satisfaction
Susan Christian, Talia C. Belcher, … Cathleen Huculak·Circulation Genomic and Precision MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2026
- Genome-wide association analysis reveals insights into the molecular aetiology underlying dilated cardiomyopathy
Sean Lee Zheng, Albert Henry, … Patrick T. Ellinor·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2024
- Identifying barriers to genetic testing in subspecialty cardiac care
Sierra Pond, Genevie Echols, … Briana L. Sawyer·medRxiv·May 15, 2024
- Cardiologists perspectives on sociocultural and structural factors shaping cardiovascular genetic testing
Heather M. Ramey, Jazmine L. Gabriel, … Marc S. Williams·Public Health GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2026