Identifying barriers to genetic testing in subspecialty cardiac care
Sierra PondiD, Genevie Echols, Martin Tristani‐FirouziiD, Susan P. EtheridgeiD, Hannah S. AndersoniD, Briana L. SawyeriD
Abstract
BackgroundThe utility of genetic testing in cardiovascular medicine is well-established in expert consensus statements for optimizing patient care. However, significant genetic testing care gaps persist for patients with inherited cardiovascular conditions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to understand why genetic testing care gaps in cardiovascular medicine exist by evaluating cardiovascular providers opinions and use of genetic testing. MethodsWe developed and administered an anonymous survey to cardiovascular providers delivering direct patient care in the United States. Participants were contacted in collaboration with the Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndromes (SADS) Foundation. ResultsA total of 111 individuals completed the survey representing the following specialties: electrophysiology (55%, n=61), general cardiology (10.8%, n=12), imaging (7.2%, n=8), heart failure/transplant (6.3%, n=7), interventional cardiology (6.3%, n=7), fetal cardiology (5.4%, n=6), and other (9%, n=10). Eighty-six percent of respondents (n=97) stated genetic testing is very relevant in the care of their patients. Eighty percent of electrophysiologists reported ordering genetic testing a few times a month or more. Navigating insurance authorization and billing procedures was an identified area of discomfort by 47.7% of respondents (n=53). Overall, cardiovascular provider specialty was shown to impact how often genetic testing is ordered. Provider work setting was shown to impact opinion of the utility of genetic testing for family screening, opinion of the utility of genetic testing for medication and device management, and how often genetic testing is ordered. ConclusionsThe results of this study support targeted provider education to increase the uptake of genetic testing for patients with inherited cardiovascular conditions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cardiologists perspectives on sociocultural and structural factors shaping cardiovascular genetic testing
Heather M. Ramey, Jazmine L. Gabriel, … Marc S. Williams·Public Health GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2026
- Genetic Counseling Educational Videos Significantly Improve Access to Genetic Testing and Counseling for Inpatients with Cardiovascular Disease
Emily E. Brown, Bryana J. Rivers, … Brittney A. Murray·medRxiv·Jun 29, 2026
- Comparing Cardiac Genetic Testing Pathways: Impacts on Access, Informed Choice, and Decisional Satisfaction
Susan Christian, Talia C. Belcher, … Cathleen Huculak·Circulation Genomic and Precision MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2026
- Impact of Cardiomyopathy and Arrhythmia Genetic Testing on Clinical Management Decisions
Ana Morales, Yi-Lee Ting, … Elizabeth M. McNally·Journal of Cardiac FailurePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Is it time for a paradigm shift? Tailored online video education instead of pretest genetic counseling facilitates high genetic test uptake and informed choice for adults seeking cardiovascular genetic testing
Bryana J. Rivers, Brittney A. Murray, … Cynthia A. James·medRxiv·Jun 1, 2026
- Cardiovascular genetic counseling is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes across clinical indications and settings
Brittney A. Murray, Catherine Gordon, … Cynthia A. James·Circulation Genomic and Precision MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2026