Benchmarking the AlphaGenome Variant Impact score against SpliceAI on post-release ClinVar classifications and experimental splicing assays
Abstract
The AlphaGenome Variant Impact (AVI) score ranks variants by predicted impact, and its developers report large gains over other genome-wide scores for intronic ClinVar variants. We tested AVI on two kinds of ground truth the developers did not use, under an analysis plan set before scoring: ClinVar classifications made after the developers' ClinVar release (87,666 rare single-nucleotide variants outside AVI's training chromosomes), and six splicing assays whose variants no predictor chose. In intronic variants at least 3 bases from an exon (449 pathogenic or likely pathogenic, 28,188 benign or likely benign), AVI reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.957. It did not differ detectably from SpliceAI (difference -0.005, 95% interval -0.017 to 0.006) or Pangolin (-0.006, -0.018 to 0.007); both intervals exclude differences larger than about 0.02. AVI had a higher AUROC than CADD (+0.071). In deep intronic variants it trailed SpliceAI (-0.070, -0.118 to -0.026). Under an adapted ClinGen calibration, AVI gave strong evidence to 52% of pathogenic variants on the pooled test set, but its levels did not hold in every region. It gave benign evidence to 24% of benign variants, against 90% for SpliceAI. On the assays, AVI ranked splice-altering variants below raw SpliceAI (pooled difference -0.089, -0.129 to -0.049) and did not differ from masked SpliceAI (+0.003). SpliceAI2, released during the study, led AVI on both kinds of ground truth. AVI did not outperform splicing predictors on AUROC and gave little benign evidence. AlphaGenome outputs are provided for research use, not for diagnostic decisions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Calibration of AlphaGenome Variant Impact and SpliceAI2 scores as PP3/BP4 evidence for missense, non-coding, and synonymous variants
Ali Babazade, Yarkın Dolaş, … Mehmet Ali Ergün·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2026
- MetaSplice: pathogenicity prediction and ACMG/AMP evidence for intronic variants outside the canonical splice sites
Xiaoming Liu·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026
- Applying AlphaGenome Variant Impact for SNV Prioritization
Hui‐Qi Qu, Hakon H. Hakonarson·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- Predicting the impact of rare variants on RNA splicing in CAGI6
Jenny Lord, Carolina Jaramillo Oquendo, … Diana Baralle·Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2024
- Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays
Cathy Smith, Jacob Otto Kitzman·bioRxiv·May 4, 2023
- Using SpliceAI to triage splice-altering variants in 7,220 individuals with rare conditions highlights limitations of the precomputed scores
Alexandra C Martin-Geary, François Lecoquierre, … Ruebena Dawes·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2026