Sign in
Evolutionary BiologyFrontiers in Plant Science
Peer-reviewed journal article

Analysis of genetic variation in Macadamia shows evidence of extensive reticulate evolution

Sachini Lakmini ManatungaiD, Agnelo FurtadoiD, Bruce L. ToppiD, Mobashwer M. AlamiD, Patrick J. MasoniD, Ardashir Kharabian MasoulehiD, Robert James HenryiD

Abstract

The genus Macadamia in the Proteaceae family includes four species. To explore diversity in macadamia genetic resources, a total of 166 wild genotypes, representing all four species, were sequenced. The four species were clearly distinguished as four separate clades in a phylogenetic analysis of nuclear gene CDS. M. integrifolia and M. tetraphylla formed a clade that had diverged from a clade including M. ternifolia and M. jansenii. The greatest diversity in nuclear and chloroplast genomes was found in the more widely distributed M. integrifolia while the rare M. jansenii showed little diversity. The chloroplast phylogeny revealed a much more complex evolutionary history. Multiple chloroplast capture events have resulted in chloroplast genome clades including genotypes from different species. This suggests extensive reticulate evolution in Macadamia despite the emergence of the four distinct species that are supported by the analysis of their nuclear genomes. The chloroplast genomes showed strong associations with geographical distribution reflecting limited maternal gene movement in these species having large seeds. The nuclear genomes showed lesser geographical differences, probably reflecting longer distance movement of pollen. This improved understanding of the distribution of diversity in Macadamia will aid conservation of these rare species now found in highly fragmented rainforest remnants. HighlightsWhole genome sequencing of population of the four species in the Macadamia genus allowed phylogenetic relationships to be determined and revealed significant reticulate evolution.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.