BiostatisticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Detection and accurate False Discovery Rate control of differentially methylated regions from Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing
Keegan D. KorthaueriD, Sutirtha ChakrabortyiD, Yuval BenjaminiiD, Rafael A. IrizarryiD
Abstract
With recent advances in sequencing technology, it is now feasible to measure DNA methylation at tens of millions of sites across the entire genome. In most applications, biologists are interested in detecting differentially methylated regions, composed of multiple sites with differing methylation levels among populations. However, current computational approaches for detecting such regions do not provide accurate statistical inference. A major challenge in reporting uncertainty is that a genome-wide scan is involved in detecting these regions, which needs to be accounted for. A further challenge is that sample sizes are limited due to the costs associated with the technology. We have developed a new approach that overcomes these challenges and assesses uncertainty for differentially methylated regions in a rigorous manner. Region-level statistics are obtained by fitting a generalized least squares (GLS) regression model with a nested autoregressive correlated error structure for the effect of interest on transformed methylation proportions. We develop an inferential approach, based on a pooled null distribution, that can be implemented even when as few as two samples per population are available. Here we demonstrate the advantages of our method using both experimental data and Monte Carlo simulation. We find that the new method improves the specificity and sensitivity of list of regions and accurately controls the False Discovery Rate (FDR).
- Citations
- 198
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- HOME: A histogram based machine learning approach for effective identification of differentially methylated regions
Akanksha Srivastava, Yuliya V. Karpievitch, … Ryan Lister·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 16, 2019
- MethCP: Differentially Methylated Region Detection with Change Point Models
Boying Gong, Elizabeth A. Purdom·Journal of Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2020
- glmmDMR reveals replicate-level methylation variance as a major determinant of false-positive DMR detection
Yuki Daito, Mako Uechi, … Kaoru Tonosaki·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- MINI REVIEW: Statistical methods for detecting differentially methylated loci and regions
Mark D Robinson, Abdullah Kahraman, … Xiaobei Zhou·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2014
- MAGIC: Methylation Analysis with Genomic Inferred Contexts
Jiaqi Han, Michael James Thompson, Matteo A. Pellegrini·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2025
- DNA methylation estimation using methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme bisulfite sequencing (MREBS)
Giancarlo Bonora, Liudmilla Rubbi, … Matteo A. Pellegrini·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2019