bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Linking plant-soil feedback with resource competition to understand plant coexistence
Abstract
1. Plant-soil feedback (PSF) is increasingly recognized as an important mechanism influencing plant coexistence, but most studies have examined PSF in isolation under controlled conditions. Under natural conditions, PSF operates together with other processes such as resource competition, yet how these processes jointly shape plant coexistence across environmental gradients remains poorly understood. 2. We combined field and greenhouse experiments to assess the contribution of PSF to plant coexistence at low- and high-elevation sites in the Swiss Alps. In the field, we quantified total niche and fitness differences and predicted interaction outcomes for nine plant species pairs, integrating PSF, resource competition, and other processes. In a complementary greenhouse experiment, we used soil microbial communities conditioned during the field experiment to isolate PSF-driven niche and fitness differences for the same species pairs. 3. PSF alone generated strong fitness differences but weak niche differences in the greenhouse experiment, predominantly predicting competitive exclusion. Interaction outcomes predicted from PSF alone corresponded poorly with those in the field, suggesting that PSF in isolation poorly explain plant coexistence under natural conditions. Nevertheless, PSF-driven niche and fitness differences were related to those quantified in the field, which were likely driven largely by resource competition, suggesting that PSF may contribute to coexistence by reinforcing or counteracting other ecological processes. These relationships varied between elevations, highlighting the context dependence of PSF contributions to coexistence. 4. Synthesis. Our study shows that the impacts of plant-soil feedback on plant coexistence cannot be understood from their effects in isolation. Instead, their contribution depends on how they interact with other ecological processes and on the environmental context in which these processes operate. Together, our findings emphasize the need to move beyond studying PSF in isolation towards quantifying how it combines with other mechanisms that drives coexistence under natural conditions.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- No robust coexistence in a canonical model of plant-soil feedbacks
Z. R. Miller, P. Lechon-Alonso, S. Allesina·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2021
- Quantifying microbially mediated fitness differences reveals the tendency for plant-soil feedbacks to drive species exclusion among California annual plants
G. Kandlikar, X. Yan, … N. J. B. Kraft·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2020
- A quantitative synthesis of soil microbial effects on plant species coexistence
X. Yan, J. M. Levine, G. S. Kandlikar·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2021
- Plant-soil feedback persists beyond host death to shape density-dependent plant competition
Ching-Lin Huang, Joe Wan, … Po‐Ju Ke·Plant and SoilPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2026
- Indirect interactions driven by soil effects enable coexistence among competing plant species
Ezequiel Antorán, Jaime Madrigal‐González, … Joaquín Calatayud·Ecology LettersPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026
- Realistic time-lags and litter dynamics alter predictions of plant-soil feedback across generations
S. X. Ou, G. S. Kandlikar, … P.-J. Ke·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2024