The American Journal of Human GeneticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel
Michael T. ParsonsiD, Miguel de la HoyaiD, Marcy E. RichardsoniD, Emma TudiniiD, Michael G. AndersoniD, Windy Berkofsky‐Fessler, Sandrine M. CaputoiD, Raymond C. Chan, Melissa ClineiD, Bing FengiD, Cristina FortuñoiD, Encarna B. Gómez-GarcíaiD, Johanna S. Hadler, Susan C. HirakiiD, Megan A. HoldreniD, Claude HoudayeriD, Kathleen S. HruskaiD, Paul Andrew JamesiD, Rachid KaramiD, Huei San Leong, Alexandra MartinsiD, Arjen R. MensenkampiD, Álvaro N.A. MonteiroiD, Vaishnavi NathaniD, Robert A. O'ConnoriD, , Amanda B. SpurdleiD
Abstract
The ENIGMA research consortium (https://enigmaconsortium.org/) develops and applies methods to determine clinical significance of variants in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer genes. An ENIGMA BRCA1/2 classification sub-group, originally formed in 2016 as a ClinGen external expert panel, evolved into a ClinGen internal Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) to align with Federal Drug Administration recognized processes for ClinVar contributions. The VCEP reviewed American College of Medical Genetics/Association of Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification criteria for relevance to interpreting BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Statistical methods were used to calibrate evidence strength for different data types. Pilot specifications were tested on 40 variants, and documentation revised for clarity and ease-of-use. The original criterion descriptions for 13 evidence codes were considered non-applicable or overlapping with other criteria. Scenario of use was extended or re-purposed for eight codes. Extensive analysis and/or data review informed specification descriptions and weights for all codes. Specifications were applied to pilot variants with pre-existing ClinVar classification as follows: 13 Uncertain Significance or Conflicting, 14 Pathogenic and/or Likely Pathogenic, and 13 Benign and/or Likely Benign. Review resolved classification for 11/13 Uncertain Significance or Conflicting variants, and retained or improved confidence in classification for the remaining variants. Alignment of pre-existing ENIGMA research classification processes with ACMG/AMP classification guidelines highlighted several gaps in both the research processes and the baseline ACMG/AMP criteria. Calibration of evidence types was key to justify utility and strength of different evidence types for gene-specific application. The gene-specific criteria demonstrated value for improving ACMG/AMP-aligned classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 104
- FWCI
- 27.25
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- HECTOR: A Web-Based Tool for Automated BRCA1/BRCA2 Variant Classification Under the ClinGen ENIGMA Specifications
Tarik Duzenli, Ali Babazade, … Mehmet Ali Ergün·medRxiv·Jul 10, 2026
- Analysis of more than 400,000 women provides case-control evidence for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification
Maria Zanti, Denise G O'Mahony, … Gary Zirpoli·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2025
- Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline ATM sequence variants
Marcy E. Richardson, Megan A. Holdren, … Fergus J. Couch·medRxiv·May 28, 2024
- Cancer genomic profiling predicts pathogenicity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants
Olga Kondrashova, Rebecca L. Johnston, … Amanda B. Spurdle·medRxiv·Mar 6, 2026
- A Comprehensive and Accessible Model for Co-Segregation Analysis in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 Variant Classification
Setareh Moghadasi, Ramin Monajemi, … Mar Rodríguez‐Girondo·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2024
- Automating ACMG Variant Classifications With BIAS-2015 v2.0.0: Algorithm Analysis and Benchmark Against the FDA-Approved eRepo Dataset
Christopher Edward Eisenhart, Rachel Brickey, … Vafa Bayat·medRxiv·Feb 23, 2025