bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies
S. Wakeling, D. Kingsley, H. R. Jamali, M. A. Kennan, M. Sarrafzadeh
Abstract
Recent research demonstrates that Australia lags in providing open access to research outputs. In Australia, while the two major research funding bodies require open access of outputs from projects they fund, these bodies only fund a small proportion of research conducted. The major source of research and experimental development funding in Australian higher education is general university, or institutional, funding, and such funds are not subject to national funder open access policies. Thus, institutional policies and other institutional supports for open access are important in understanding Australias OA position. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to understand the characteristics of Australian institutional open access policies and to explore the extent they represent a coherent and unified approach to delivering and promoting open access in Australia. Open access policies were located using a systematic web search approach and then their contents were analysed. Only half of Australian universities were found to have an open access policy. There was a wide variation in language used, expressed intent of the policy and expectations of researchers. Few policies mention monitoring or compliance and only three mention consequences for non-compliance. While it is understandable that institutions develop their own policies, when language is used which does not reflect national and international understandings, when requirements are not clear and with consequences, policies are unlikely to contribute to understanding of open access, to uptake of the policy, or to ease of transferring understanding and practices between institutions. A more unified approach to open access is recommended.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating institutional open access performance: Methodology, challenges and assessment
C.-K. Huang, C. Neylon, … C. Brookes-Kenworthy·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2020
- Only two out of five articles by New Zealand researchers are free-to-access: a multiple API study of access, citations, cost of Article Processing Charges (APC), and the potential to increase the proportion of open access
R. K. A. White, A. Angelo, … B. D. White·PeerJPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2021
- Open access policies of leading medical journals: a cross-sectional study
T. S. Ellison, T. Koder, … C. Winchester·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2018
- Estimated costs of implementing an open access policy at a private foundation
C. Strasser, E. Khare·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2017
- Benchmarking of open access publication rates for the pharmaceutical industry and research-intensive academic institutions: development and demonstration of a live, open monitoring tool
Tomas Rees, Valérie Philippon, … T. J. Koder·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2024
- Evaluating institutional open access performance: Sensitivity analysis
C.-K. Huang, C. Neylon, … C. Brookes-Kenworthy·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2020